On 23 Jul 2018, at 20:12, Johan Brichau <johan@inceptive.be> wrote:Hi Richard,Thanks for pointing out the difference between #on: and #with: instance creation methods.This lead me to discover that ReadWriteStream>>on: strangely sets the readLimit instvar to the end��� which is not what I would expect.Removing that method and reversing the change in the commit I mentioned fixes all the tests on ReadWriteStream in Grease.The Grease tests have been written to test the ANSI behavior and, afaik, they make sense.JohanOn 23 Jul 2018, at 17:51, Richard O'Keefe <raoknz@gmail.com> wrote:(ReadWriteStream on: 'abc') contents==> 'abc' in GNU Smalltalk and Dolphin==> '' in Squeak 6.0 and ST/XHere I think we see why ANSI Smalltalk defined #with:for {Read,}WriteStreams but not #on:.When you recall that ReadWriteStream is a subclass ofWriteStream in most Smalltalks, and that(WriteStream on: (String new: 20))or whatever is normally used with the argument of #on:expected to provide *workspace*, not *content*,why on earth would you expect(ReadWriteStream on: 'abc') contentsto be different from(WriteStream on: 'abc') contentswhich is ''?On 23 July 2018 at 21:50, Johan Brichau <johan@inceptive.be> wrote:Hi,As I���m diving into the changes and why it fails:(ReadWriteStream on: ���abc���) contents-> = ���abc��� on Pharo 6-> = ������ on Pharo 7That seems wrong to me.(I���ve also sent this question via github on the commit itself https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/commit/ )9e442addff3790af0c78dbc73f1f34 9de8a4ad03#diff- ba7cc7962a4a22468a18b31fe75ada 04 cheersJohanOn 22 Jul 2018, at 10:52, Johan Brichau <johan@inceptive.be> wrote:Hi,I am taking a look at making Grease and Seaside work correctly on Pharo7.There have been a number of changes to the ReadWriteStream implementation in Pharo that break Grease tests: https://travis-ci.org/SeasideSt/Grease/jobs/ 406766720 It seems ReadWriteStream is broken: the readLimit is almost always wrong meaning that the stream `atEnd`, `contents` etc.. return wrong valuesBefore I dive into this, I wanted to inquire if anyone is working on this as I cannot seem to find any open cases on this on the issue tracker.cheersJohan