2014-10-23 17:04 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:

>> Why do you use the pharo shell script instead of pharo-vm with
>> --no-display? Is there any benefit other than having the pwd set to
>> the image location? And hence, the argument script should be relative
>> to the image.
>
> No particular reason, mostly because I hate adding the --no-display
> But yes, I usually bypass the script and use the executable directly.

I don't know how Pharo resolves the file names by default.

Pharo's FileLocator seems to provide something similar to the
Dolphin's FileLocator I'm used to work with�� (see attached image) to
avoid the "resolution guessing" of relative paths when defined in the
context of a script or app code (e.g. to specify template files).
I should use it more. :)

> All this sharing, talking & discussing, even over small issues and style is important, we can all learn a lot from each other and save time and money.

Absolutely.

I'd like to know the development process of others, from SCM to
building, deploying and server provisioning.

After a year o Pharo development I think I'm ready to embrace a CI
server (I already use scripts to build images), but I think I will
move all my repositories to git before.

However, my remote server provisioning is still manual, and too
rudimentary even for my own taste. If I could speed up this, I would
deliver features faster to my customers. Now everything runs inside a
two week sprint window.

Regards,

Esteban A. Maringolo