I was using 2.0

---
Philippe Back
Dramatic Performance Improvements
Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
Mail:phil@highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu
Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos

High Octane SPRL
rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium

Pharo Consortium Member -�http://consortium.pharo.org/
Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast -�http://spamcast.libsyn.com
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value Added Reseller



On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
phil was working with 3.0 (afaik)
mariano was having problems with flushing monticello caches.

I think it was not the same.

Esteban

On Sep 4, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Paul DeBruicker <pdebruic@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 09/04/2013 12:54 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>> I'm not sure what we are seeing in pharo3 is the same problem reported in pharo2.
>> Of course if it is, we will backport.
>> But "inflation" problem in ph3 is very consistent and repeatable, the problem reported in ph2... well, I never seen it before, and we have just one report (and I assume that we have more than one hundred production projects with that version).
>> So is likely something different (also some of the detected leaks are due to changes in ph3, not present in the older version).
>>
>> Esteban
>
>
> heres two more reports about image size in another thread (Phil & Mariano):
>
> http://forum.world.st/Large-images-reasons-WAS-Re-Pharo-2-0-with-Seaside-DBXTalk-GlorpDBX-Magritte-3-TWBS-is-getting-slower-tp4701743.html
>
>
>