But I like the idea of doru to have separate configurations less complexity and mess to manage.


Le 7/3/15 12:59, Torsten Bergmann a ��crit��:
Why another config? We have groups in the config. So one can load the core or tools.

Bye
T.




Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com>schrieb:
Ok. I will add a dependency from Pillar-Pharo-Tools to PetitParser core.

Actually, I would rather prefer to create a separate ConfigurationOfPillarTools that adds the Pillar-Pharo-Tools and the PetitParser dependency. What that be Ok?

Cheers,
Doru

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mar 6, 2015 1:25 AM, "Tudor Girba" <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> - now that the inspector and spotter are part of Pharo, we can move these extensions directly into Pillar.�� The only problem is that this syntax highlighting is based on PetitParser, so we would have to add a dependency from Pillar to PetitParser. What do you think?

Please don't make pillar core depend on petitparser (except if main pillar parser is rewritten in petitparser :-)). I have no problem having petitparser as a dependency of pillar-pharo-tools though.




--

"Every thing has its own flow"