I like to concept of the Type Providers and the Deedle library.
http://fsharp.github.io/FSharp.Data/
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh156509.aspx
http://bluemountaincapital.github.io/Deedle/
BW,
Volkert
Am 30.07.2014 um 23:45 schrieb Tudor Girba:
I did watch the movie. The only interesting thing it has are the types. Besides that, from what I can see in the demo, the interactivity and the options of the GTPlayground/GTInspector is, in my opinion, better.
And we just got started :).
Doru
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:38 PM, volkert@nivoba.de <volkert@nivoba.de> wrote:
Please watch the video.
BW,
Volkert
Am 30.07.2014 um 22:12 schrieb stepharo:
On 30/7/14 21:57, Tudor Girba wrote:
Moose is not about software analysis, but about data analysis :)
+1
and you can morph it to your needs and participate :)
Look at the Roassal demos, or at the work around the GTPlayground or GTInspector:
Doru
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:47 PM, volkert@nivoba.de <volkert@nivoba.de> wrote:
Here a really nice video on interactive data aquiring, analysis und visualization with F#.
http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Understanding-the-World-with-F
Is this the way Pharo + Roassal + ... goes? Ok, we have moose, but a i understand
it puts the focus on sw analysis and sw visualization. What about a new
easy to use and interactive data science platform?
BW,
Volkert
--
www.nivoba.de
"The more complex an object, the larger the investment in learning to use it, and the greater the resistance to abandon it.", NW
--
"Every thing has its own flow"
-- www.nivoba.de "The more complex an object, the larger the investment in learning to use it, and the greater the resistance to abandon it.", NW
--
"Every thing has its own flow"
-- www.nivoba.de "The more complex an object, the larger the investment in learning to use it, and the greater the resistance to abandon it.", NW