Ok I understand, and I guess modifying this would mean re-engineering the whole thing, right?<div><br></div><div>Are there any alternatives around? Could you, for example, use Moose to analyse smalltalk code quality? I&#39;ve heard about Chuck too, but I&#39;m not sure the project is alive...</div>

<div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div><br></div><div>Bernat.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/4/5 Lukas Renggli <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:renggli@gmail.com">renggli@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

<div class="im">&gt; On the other topic, I&#39;m not sure I completely understood what the problem<br>
&gt; is. Couldn&#39;t we write an extension to Code Critics that ran on unloaded<br>
&gt; code?<br>
<br>
</div>The problem is that Code Critics makes the assumption that the code is<br>
loaded and does a lot of hard-core reflection using the system API.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Lukas<br>
<br>
--<br>
Lukas Renggli<br>
<a href="http://www.lukas-renggli.ch" target="_blank">www.lukas-renggli.ch</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>