> Have you tried the matrix implementation in the numerical package from
> Didier H. Besset?
>
>
http://squeaksource.com/@Q45T_l348Ag07gGT/VMsGzidC
>
>
>
>
> -----------------
> Benoit St-Jean
> A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero.
> (Albert Einstein)
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:33:17 -0300
>> From:
hernan.morales@gmail.com
>> To:
pharo-users@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> Subject: [Pharo-users] Fastest matrix implementation?
>>
>> Hi list
>>
>> In the context of a scientific project here we are building big
>> matrices for later processing, mostly exporting to custom file formats
>> for PLINK, HaploView, etc (bioinformatics tools). I've tested one of
>> our scripts in both Pharo 1.1 (not CogVM) with the corresponding
>> Python 2.6 implementation (without PyPy), and the performance in
>> Python was superior, about 8x faster than ST.
>> So I wonder if anyone knows the fastest (or a faster) implementation
>> of Matrix than the included by default in Collections?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
--
Hern�n Morales
Information Technology Manager,
Institute of Veterinary Genetics.
National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET).
La Plata (1900), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Telephone: +54 (0221) 421-1799.
Internal: 422
Fax: 425-7980 or 421-1799.