Stef - hmm thats an interesting feature as well, I�ll have a quick look. I tried committing my changes but I don�t have commit writes on that project. I have entered a Fogbugz issue in the Launcher category and attached my slice to it. I still think I�m doing something wrong with Monticello though. I thought I was getting to grips with it, but when I compared my slice against the smalltalk hub repo for Launcher, it shows a lot more outgoing changes than are mine. Mine are in there - but there are lots of other classes which I know I didn�t change which show with a green tick as an outgoing change? It has me very confused. Yet - If I take a fresh Luancher image and then apply my Slice it works fine (and also shows just my changes). Could it be the Smalltalk hub repo has moved on a lot since the released version of Launcher - but then surely when diffing changes it would just consider what is in my slice. I think I�m missing something important. Tim
On 11 Aug 2014, at 11:49, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:Hi tim I would love a sync from file possibility because I often remove directly folders and after the launcher is dead. I think that to contribute you should commits code in the inbox of the project. Damien is on vacation now but I'm sure he will welcome help.Hi - I�ve added a few interesting features to PharoLauncher, but I�m not sure what the steps are for contributing to a SmalltalkHub project? My proposed changes are as follows: - Change default image template name to include the parent folder name (e.g. Pharo 4.0 (beta)-540123 vs. 450123) - Add a new image command �Image Summary� that shows you the date of the last image modification as well as the contents of �description.txt� - as I can�t always remember why I have some old images kicking around (this change is quite basic - I couldn�t see how best to create a nice popup window so I reused the deny: one with a new title. I did think possibly a hover over balloon or having something like the comments panel in Pharo - but its a modal dialog for now) - I changed the Run icon to a play button (as the process icon used - seemed a bit obscure) Tim