Kasper
Osterbye schrieb am Donnerstag, 28. April 2022 19:03:07
(+02:00):
Kasper Osterbye schrieb
am Dienstag, 26. April 2022 14:50:51 (+02:00):
I have now raised it as an issue on the issue tracker
If I may suggest a solution it will be
to:
- add two new methods - prefixedBy: and suffixedBy: to handle the empty prefix/suffix
correctly
- add comments to beginsWith: and endsWith:
referring to the two
new methods
The problem is that there is client code which depend on the
(wrong) implementation of the beginsWith and endsWith
methods.