My position is that OpenDBX as a library, independently of Pharo, is a dead end. It might have been a good candidate in the past, but today it has no real use.

But it is also true that for Pharo it is the only option you have to run it on Linux.

Regards,

ps: I would also avoid Oracle altogether as well, but given the fact it seems to be a requirement I didn't bring it to the discussion.

El abr 2, 2015 11:04 AM, "Norbert Hartl" <norbert@hartl.name> escribi��:

Am 02.04.2015 um 13:55 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:

On 02 Apr 2015, at 13:13, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:

Am 02.04.2015 um 12:52 schrieb Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo@gmail.com>:

I don't know if you need full fledged access or just to read a few tables.

If it the latest you can use PostgreSQL Foreign Data Wrappers (FDW) and access the pgsql instance using the existing PGv2 driver.

I know it might look convoluted, and maybe it is, but you avoid using DBX.

I would also avoid using oracle which is a prerequisite, right? :) So DBX is to avoid? Sorry, I didn't care very much about SQL engines the last years.

why DBX is to avoid?

I don't know. I read the sentence "I know it might look convoluted, and maybe it is, but you avoid using DBX." as avoiding DBX is something positive. So I want to know as well.

in linux, it is your only chance for connecting to oracle (in windows you could also use odbc).��

and it should be working, AFAIK

I'm fine with using DBX as long as it works. I understood also that it is one of the higher prioritized tasks for the consortium.

Norbert

Esteban

Norbert

Regards.

Ps: FDW are amazing.

El abr 2, 2015 6:07 AM, "Norbert Hartl" <norbert@hartl.name> escribi��:

I see from time to time topics like SQL popping up. Most of the time DBXTalk seems to be a requirement. It is also something that is considered necessary for a lot of people. Now have the need to access an oracle database. Is that possible? And if yes does it also work on linux?

Norbert