We were thinking of keeping the current image alive for one or two more months.�
Then replace it with just a simple view of the file system.


On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:50 AM, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr> wrote:

On May 7, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Andrei Vasile Chis <chisvasileandrei@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Given that SmalltalkHub is now stable we were considering to discontinue SqueakSource.
> Our idea is to provide a grace period of a couple of months to allow the current active users to migrate their projects to the new service and then simply put squeaksource in read-only mode (simply exposing the directory structure and allowing downloads).
>
> What do you think about it ?
> Are there any good reasons to still keep SqueakSource alive?

Keep it alive so that we can slowly migrate. Because migrating takes a lot of time.



>
> Cheers,
> The SCG Team