Hi, I resume my question in the dev list. GLMBrowser is used in drgeo for its user script editor. I have to admit I am not comfortable with, I needed Tudor help to make the drgeo script editor fully functional. Between P7 and P8, the method GLMCompositePresentation>>wrapper was removed along the related GLMWrapper class. These ones are used by the script editor. However when searching for the bug entries I can't find the relevant information about these changes. Why? https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues?q=is%3Aclosed+milestone%3A8.0.... I need to know why #wrapper was removed. Any tips welcome. Thanks Hilaire -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
Hi hilaire May be we were starting to remove unused classes and it was probably a mistake (mine certainly). What I suggest to you is that you take the one of P7 and added to your P8 in a little package. Sorry for the mess. Our problem is that we accumulate a lot of unmaintained code and this is paralyzing us. When we maintain such code we do not have the time to create new and better one. S
On 5 Mar 2020, at 19:59, Hilaire <hilaire@drgeo.eu> wrote:
Hi,
I resume my question in the dev list.
GLMBrowser is used in drgeo for its user script editor. I have to admit I am not comfortable with, I needed Tudor help to make the drgeo script editor fully functional.
Between P7 and P8, the method GLMCompositePresentation>>wrapper was removed along the related GLMWrapper class. These ones are used by the script editor.
However when searching for the bug entries I can't find the relevant information about these changes. Why?
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues?q=is%3Aclosed+milestone%3A8.0....
I need to know why #wrapper was removed.
Any tips welcome.
Thanks
Hilaire
-- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
Hi Steph, Ok. I did that for now. May be time to learn spec2. Hilaire Le 05/03/2020 à 20:56, ducasse a écrit :
May be we were starting to remove unused classes and it was probably a mistake (mine certainly). What I suggest to you is that you take the one of P7 and added to your P8 in a little package.
Sorry for the mess. Our problem is that we accumulate a lot of unmaintained code and this is paralyzing us. When we maintain such code we do not have the time to create new and better one.
-- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
On 5 Mar 2020, at 22:40, Hilaire <hilaire@drgeo.eu> wrote:
Hi Steph,
Ok. I did that for now.
May be time to learn spec2.
Yes and I should write something but focusing on PBE80 and the mooc for now.
Hilaire
Le 05/03/2020 à 20:56, ducasse a écrit :
May be we were starting to remove unused classes and it was probably a mistake (mine certainly). What I suggest to you is that you take the one of P7 and added to your P8 in a little package.
Sorry for the mess. Our problem is that we accumulate a lot of unmaintained code and this is paralyzing us. When we maintain such code we do not have the time to create new and better one.
-- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
participants (2)
-
ducasse -
Hilaire