On Aug 30, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:

I agree with Andreas that the process for including packages in Pharo is not transparent (at least not me).

read the open and transparent discussions that happened over the past months in this mailing-list: check for webClient in the title :) For pharo: this is really simple - we discuss in the mailing-list - reach a consensus - act. Tell me once you will have read the mails if this is not what we did and how we could improve them. I would like to have the same process than python but we are too small for that right now.

Dont know the process for Squeak either - but at least we all should take care to keep the whole platform and forks open. Maybe the license should be a required field in Squeaksource for any new project.

Havent followed the whole thread - but I still wonder what the reason for Andreas is to not release Webclient as MIT? Especially since I think it could be a nice addition to the standard images (Squeak, Pharo or whatever) ...

Bye T.

-- GMX DSL SOMMER-SPECIAL: Surf & Phone Flat 16.000 für nur 19,99 ¿/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project