On Aug 29, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
3. Is anyone using the versions that take a string message (e.g. #haltOnce:). A halt brings you into a debugger, so is the extra info worth the added complexity? p.s. right now, the versions are cut-and-pastes of each other
What about the versions that take a string message? Can we remove them since we have the call stack open in a debugger anyway?
Yes, I would say remove. -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
marcus.denker wrote:
Yes, I would say remove.
I've never removed a core method. What is the latest deprecation policy? Or just remove? Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Halt-tp3774723p3775839.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
self deprecate:in:on: or something like that. On Aug 29, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
marcus.denker wrote:
Yes, I would say remove.
I've never removed a core method. What is the latest deprecation policy? Or just remove?
Sean
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Halt-tp3774723p3775839.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (3)
-
Marcus Denker -
Sean P. DeNigris -
Stéphane Ducasse