Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] Jenkins
On May 22, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Geert Claes wrote:
Marcus Denker-4 wrote:
The problem is that this is a company wide installation serving many projects... Pharo is just one of them.
But everything is Pharo based and even the URL includes "Pharo" does it not?
Yes, the IT services provide infrastructure that creates Jenkins setups. E.g. we can request one for RMOD, and there will be one for Rmod. Yes, we could request them to extend this meta-setup it with changing the look. But the thing is that this *We* can not do, but the admines would need to do it. And it would be work to provide a UI for uploading images, checking they are good... And my feeling is that they have other things that are more important to do (the whole setup is in test mode...) Especially we should *use* it before running back and requesting even more changes. (and unimportant ones, especially)... It's just not a good idea to do that now. Marcus
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Hudson-Jenkins-tp3538245p3541662.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
Marcus Denker-4 wrote:
Yes, the IT services provide infrastructure that creates Jenkins setups. E.g. we can request one for RMOD, and there will be one for Rmod.
Yes, we could request them to extend this meta-setup it with changing the look. But the thing is that this *We* can not do, but the admines would need to do it. And it would be work to provide a UI for uploading images, checking they are good...
Provide a UI for uploading images? Say what? Marcus Denker-4 wrote:
And my feeling is that they have other things that are more important to do (the whole setup is in test mode...)
Especially we should *use* it before running back and requesting even more changes. (and unimportant ones, especially)...
It's just not a good idea to do that now.
Marcus
Look-and-feel has historically always come in second (except at companies like Apple, even when they were a small) and developers have always defended the *use* first before *look-n-feel* ... I reckon its bs! The 3 images attached are exactly the same size and even have the same name for crying out loud. How hard is it really to replace 3 resource images? Anyhow, it was just a suggestion do with them what you want :) -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Hudson-Jenkins-tp3538245p3541725.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (2)
-
Geert Claes -
Marcus Denker