Re: [Pharo-project] [COTDC] 101 - TarArchiveMember
This class should be removed. By not defining any method (instance and class side), it is useless. Alexandre On 7 Jan 2012, at 23:26, sean@clipperadams.com wrote:
100 classes done 796 classes remaining Continuing in Compression...
Today: TarArchiveMember
Comment Of The Day Contest - One Day One Comment Rules: #1: Each day a not commented class is elected. Each day the best comment will be integrated with name of the author(s). #2: If you cannot comment it, deprecate it. Results: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest
p.s. this message was sent from a pharo image. Did you know you could easily do that?!
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Thanks, Alexandre :) The TarArchive class itself is very sparse. The class comment says: "... It is here as a placeholder". Maybe it too can be removed. I'll have to get a closer look. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/COTDC-101-TarArchiveMember-tp4274769p4285338.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Sean P. DeNigris