Stéphane Ducasse writes:

On 11 Apr 2014, at 11:37, Nicolas Petton <petton.nicolas@gmail.com> wrote:

...

+ Announcer >> + on:do:for:

Nicolas did you check the api of Pharo? Because I was wondering why in Pharo we do not have the for: argument

Yes, the difference is that we need it to be able to unregister later. Pharo doesn't have that issue. Nico

...

+ Node >> + navigationNodeAt:ifAbsent: + BlockClosure >> + tryCatch: + Environment >> + evaluate:for: + AmberCli >> + version: + Object >> + deprecatedAPI: - Environment >> - eval:on: - evaluateString:on:

Cheers, Nico -- Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr

_______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list@lists.esug.org http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

-- Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr