[Pharo-project] About Issue 248
Comment 1 by marcus.denker , Today (5 hours ago) I can not merge the slice from the inbox... Comment 2 by ncell...@ifrance.com , Today (65 minutes ago) Hello Marcus, why is this so? Isn't it because Kernel-nice.208 was moved in ParoTreatedInbox ? Very productive week end guys !
Nicolas I know that when marcus tried to load the slice we got a problem with the dependencies so may we did a mistake moving file to pharoTreated. Now we have a problem because we are spending too much time because dependencies and scripting squeaksource is not really supported. Stef On Oct 26, 2008, at 10:30 PM, nicolas cellier wrote:
Comment 1 by marcus.denker , Today (5 hours ago)
I can not merge the slice from the inbox...
Comment 2 by ncell...@ifrance.com , Today (65 minutes ago)
Hello Marcus, why is this so?
Isn't it because Kernel-nice.208 was moved in ParoTreatedInbox ?
Very productive week end guys !
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@...> writes:
Nicolas
I know that when marcus tried to load the slice we got a problem with the dependencies so may we did a mistake moving file to pharoTreated. Now we have a problem because we are spending too much time because dependencies and scripting squeaksource is not really supported.
Stef
On Oct 26, 2008, at 10:30 PM, nicolas cellier wrote:
I see. The SLICE was just Kernel+KernelTests. Just tell me how I can help: - provide a change set ? - merge with latest kernel and republish in PharoInbox ? My feeling was that the ChangeList tool was the Achilles' Heel of change sets, and that Monticello merge tool was more comfortable, but you certainly are more experienced there. Nicolas
On Oct 27, 2008, at 9:07 AM, nicolas cellier wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@...> writes:
Nicolas
I know that when marcus tried to load the slice we got a problem with the dependencies so may we did a mistake moving file to pharoTreated. Now we have a problem because we are spending too much time because dependencies and scripting squeaksource is not really supported.
Stef
On Oct 26, 2008, at 10:30 PM, nicolas cellier wrote:
I see. The SLICE was just Kernel+KernelTests.
Just tell me how I can help: - provide a change set ? - merge with latest kernel and republish in PharoInbox ?
My feeling was that the ChangeList tool was the Achilles' Heel of change sets, and that Monticello merge tool was more comfortable, but you certainly are more experienced there.
No I agree. The problem is that dependencies are not well managed by MCbrowser and that we cannot script Squeaksource. Stef
Nicolas
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (2)
-
nicolas cellier -
Stéphane Ducasse