Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following results: 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? Cheers, Adrian [1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BaselineTestResults ___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
It's possible that the baseline mechanism isn't accurate. I'll check that. Someone could also verify the baselines. That would help. Cheers, Mike On Sunday, July 5, 2009, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following results: 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors
Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors
I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests?
Cheers,
Adrian
[1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BaselineTestResults
___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On 05.07.2009, at 12:36, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following results: 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors
Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors
I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests?
I think this is because of the Traits-based test for Collections (written by Cyrille). Marcus -- Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
It's probably that.I just try to run the tests from FloatArray ( that was not tested at all before), it represent 251 tests. With all collections tested it seems possible that there is like 2000 new tests. 2009/7/6 Marcus Denker <denker@acm.org>
On 05.07.2009, at 12:36, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following results: 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors
Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors
I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests?
I think this is because of the Traits-based test for Collections (written by Cyrille).
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard<adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following results: 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors
Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors
I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests?
More tests, less problems, why do you care? :-) -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry
Sure it's a good thing. We should make sure our test output is telling the truth.,... Mike On Monday, July 6, 2009, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard<adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following results: 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors
Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors
I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests?
More tests, less problems, why do you care? :-)
-- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Yes mike so if you can check that it would just great. On Jul 6, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
Sure it's a good thing. We should make sure our test output is telling the truth.,... Mike On Monday, July 6, 2009, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard<adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following results: 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors
Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors
I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests?
More tests, less problems, why do you care? :-)
yes i will do. just a bit busy ;-) but it's great to see a bunch of new tests in the image. I will post my scripts onto the wiki and perhaps someone can review for inclusion in the image - needs a bit of work. i would like a single click that writes out the test run in google wiki format then anyone can upload baseline results. we could then host this on a server somewhere etc.... cheers mike On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse<stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Yes mike so if you can check that it would just great.
On Jul 6, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
Sure it's a good thing. We should make sure our test output is telling the truth.,... Mike On Monday, July 6, 2009, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard<adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following results: 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors
Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors
I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests?
More tests, less problems, why do you care? :-)
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
traits at work :) Stef On Jul 5, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following results: 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors
Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors
I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests?
Cheers,
Adrian
[1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BaselineTestResults
___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (6)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Cyrille Delaunay -
Damien Cassou -
Marcus Denker -
Michael Roberts -
Stéphane Ducasse