Branch: refs/tags/30843 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Without any information on what has been changed these GitHub messages are almost pure noise. It's more than tedious to expect someone to follow the link to get more info. Can the system not include at least the commit comment? Eliot (phone) On Apr 29, 2014, at 4:12 AM, GitHub <noreply@github.com> wrote:
Branch: refs/tags/30843 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
On 29 Apr 2014, at 15:29, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
Without any information on what has been changed these GitHub messages are almost pure noise. It's more than tedious to expect someone to follow the link to get more info. Can the system not include at least the commit comment?
There are two mails: 1) useless 2) it has *everything* -> changed methods and classes -> commit comments -> Link to get the diffs very nicely formatted. Sadly we did not find a way to turn of this one useless mail. There is sadly no option.
Eliot (phone)
On Apr 29, 2014, at 4:12 AM, GitHub <noreply@github.com> wrote:
Branch: refs/tags/30843 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Hi Marcus, On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 29 Apr 2014, at 15:29, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
Without any information on what has been changed these GitHub messages are almost pure noise. It's more than tedious to expect someone to follow the link to get more info. Can the system not include at least the commit comment?
There are two mails:
1) useless 2) it has *everything* -> changed methods and classes -> commit comments -> Link to get the diffs very nicely formatted.
Sadly we did not find a way to turn of this one useless mail. There is sadly no option.
So who develops github? Are they willing to provide a third option? Another potential solution would be to direct the full commit to a server that filters/edits down the full messages and resends. Personally I'd like to keep up with the GitHub commits through email but right now I just delete them. I could filter them out but that's no better. :-(
Eliot (phone)
On Apr 29, 2014, at 4:12 AM, GitHub <noreply@github.com> wrote:
Branch: refs/tags/30843 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
On 29 Apr 2014, at 16:13, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Marcus,
On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 29 Apr 2014, at 15:29, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
Without any information on what has been changed these GitHub messages are almost pure noise. It's more than tedious to expect someone to follow the link to get more info. Can the system not include at least the commit comment?
There are two mails:
1) useless 2) it has *everything* -> changed methods and classes -> commit comments -> Link to get the diffs very nicely formatted.
Sadly we did not find a way to turn of this one useless mail. There is sadly no option.
So who develops github? Github inc. they have now >10 million repositories. got 100mill funding in 2012â¦
Are they willing to provide a third option? Unlikely, considering the scale of the operation.
Another potential solution would be to direct the full commit to a server that filters/edits down the full messages and resends.
Yes, I was thinking about that⦠but who has the time?
Personally I'd like to keep up with the GitHub commits through email but right now I just delete them. I could filter them out but that's no better. :-(
Eliot (phone)
On Apr 29, 2014, at 4:12 AM, GitHub <noreply@github.com> wrote:
Branch: refs/tags/30843 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Hi Marcus, On Apr 30, 2014, at 6:42 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 29 Apr 2014, at 16:13, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Marcus,
On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 29 Apr 2014, at 15:29, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
Without any information on what has been changed these GitHub messages are almost pure noise. It's more than tedious to expect someone to follow the link to get more info. Can the system not include at least the commit comment?
There are two mails:
1) useless 2) it has *everything* -> changed methods and classes -> commit comments -> Link to get the diffs very nicely formatted.
Sadly we did not find a way to turn of this one useless mail. There is sadly no option.
So who develops github? Github inc. they have now >10 million repositories. got 100mill funding in 2012â¦
Are they willing to provide a third option? Unlikely, considering the scale of the operation.
Surely that's completely backwards. If they have 100mil (lira?) per year to spend they have the resources to improve their product. Do they have a feedback channel through which you could ask? Why don't you ask them?
Another potential solution would be to direct the full commit to a server that filters/edits down the full messages and resends. Yes, I was thinking about that⦠but who has the time?
Right. We should just wallow in depression. Killing myself takes too much effort.
Personally I'd like to keep up with the GitHub commits through email but right now I just delete them. I could filter them out but that's no better. :-(
Eliot (phone)
On Apr 29, 2014, at 4:12 AM, GitHub <noreply@github.com> wrote:
Branch: refs/tags/30843 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Eliot Miranda-2 wrote
Do they have a feedback channel through which you could ask? Why don't you ask them?
Their feedback channel is unbelievable given how most companies handle customer service - you contact them via github.com, and a real, knowledgable person gets back to you... I've reached out and await their reply. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/pharo-project-pharo-core-tp4756985p4757258.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
I've reached out and await their reply.
From github support: The pharo-project/pharo-core repository is using the Email Service Hook to provide notifications on push. The Email Service Hook doesn't currently allow you to configure which pushes should trigger notifications.Note that these are not regular GitHub Notifications [1], and that many open source projects do not use the Email Service Hook for notifications on push, because of the volume of email generated.
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/pharo-project-pharo-core-tp4756985p4757293.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Sean, *thank you*. Just to be sure, the requirement is for the email service to be tailorable so that one can ask e.g. for the commit id /and/ the commit comment, or the commit id, commit comment and affected files. Is that what you asked for? On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com>wrote:
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
I've reached out and await their reply.
From github support: The pharo-project/pharo-core repository is using the Email Service Hook to provide notifications on push. The Email Service Hook doesn't currently allow you to configure which pushes should trigger notifications.Note that these are not regular GitHub Notifications [1], and that many open source projects do not use the Email Service Hook for notifications on push, because of the volume of email generated.
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/pharo-project-pharo-core-tp4756985p4757293.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- best, Eliot
participants (4)
-
Eliot Miranda -
GitHub -
Marcus Denker -
Sean P. DeNigris