On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Alexander Lazarević <laza@blobworks.com>wrote:

2011/11/29 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com>

...

-1 => executable name -2 .. -n => VM arguments *including* image (if explicitly supplied).

Before we had (at least on Linux and I guess with the StackVM):

0 => executable name -1 .. -n => VM arguments *including* image (if explicitly supplied).

Right. And that makes sense.

Why the need to change that? And what's 0 returning now? The same as 1 (with path)?

I wanted all three platforms to be the same (the Mac was not answering any VM parameters at all, and Windows was returning the executable in -1). But I missed that 0 was answering the executable name. It makes no sense for Smalltalk getSystemAttribute: 0 and Smalltalk getSystemAttribute: -1 to answer the same thing. I will change it (back) to 0 => executable name -1 .. -n => VM arguments *including* image (if explicitly supplied). and do so on all platforms. Thanks for spotting this. Alex

-- best, Eliot