relatively stable can you compare what you loaded in 1.3 and what is in 1.4 Would be good to update the configruationOf Then one day we should fix the rename (because it is not implemented). Stef On Oct 31, 2011, at 10:23 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:

Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

"ConfigurationOfFilesystem load" causes no errors, but loads Filesystem-cwp.120 which contains no classes or extension methods.

Loading the individual packages (FS-AnsiStreams, Disk, Memory & Zip) looks okay. All tests in FS-Tests-Core pass.

Is the Filesystem API relatively stable or will there be many changes?

Thanks. Sean

-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Is-FS-loadable-in-1-3-tp3961499p3961714.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, Please note that the official up-to-date ConfigurationOfFilesystem can be found in the squeaksource.com/fs repository. Cheers, Doru On 31 Oct 2011, at 23:04, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:

Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

can you compare what you loaded in 1.3 and what is in 1.4

What's the best way to do that? From the MC Browser, they look pretty similar. It seems that updates are being made in both sqs/FS and gemstone/pharo14, and many (but not all?) of the sqs changes seem to be getting merged into pharo14.

-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Is-FS-loadable-in-1-3-tp3961499p3961836.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- www.tudorgirba.com "In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."

Tudor Girba-2 wrote:

Please note that the official up-to-date ConfigurationOfFilesystem can be found in the squeaksource.com/fs repository.

All 311 tests pass for #latestVersion in 1.3-rc. Sweet. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Is-FS-loadable-in-1-3-tp3961499p3962226.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.