Why does Pharo save everything with CR line endings? Literally nobody uses that. Peter
I think this is for historical reason. Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Why does Pharo save everything with CR line endings? Literally nobody uses that.
Peter
Well yes, but Mac OS X (the first Mac using LF instead of CR) was released 14 years ago. All *nixes uses LF and Windows CRLF. So if we are not going to respect the platform, at least we could adhere to unix standards (LF). On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
I think this is for historical reason.
Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Why does Pharo save everything with CR line endings? Literally nobody uses that.
Peter
We should indeed consider doing it, I believe Cuis has done the same.
On 04 Aug 2015, at 00:11, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Well yes, but Mac OS X (the first Mac using LF instead of CR) was released 14 years ago. All *nixes uses LF and Windows CRLF. So if we are not going to respect the platform, at least we could adhere to unix standards (LF).
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote: I think this is for historical reason.
Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Why does Pharo save everything with CR line endings? Literally nobody uses that.
Peter
Le 4/8/15 12:09, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
We should indeed consider doing it, I believe Cuis has done the same.
yes But we should finish all the change we started :)
On 04 Aug 2015, at 00:11, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Well yes, but Mac OS X (the first Mac using LF instead of CR) was released 14 years ago. All *nixes uses LF and Windows CRLF. So if we are not going to respect the platform, at least we could adhere to unix standards (LF).
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote: I think this is for historical reason.
Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Why does Pharo save everything with CR line endings? Literally nobody uses that.
Peter
stepharo wrote
Le 4/8/15 12:09, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
We should indeed consider doing it, I believe Cuis has done the same.
+1. It's a pain to have e.g. fileouts in vim squished into one massive line with special characters displayed. stepharo wrote
But we should finish all the change we started :)
+1 also :) ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/line-endings-tp4840829p4841106.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
stepharo wrote
Le 4/8/15 12:09, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
We should indeed consider doing it, I believe Cuis has done the same.
+1. It's a pain to have e.g. fileouts in vim squished into one massive line with special characters displayed.
It is but :e ++ff=mac helps. Levente
stepharo wrote
But we should finish all the change we started :)
+1 also :)
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/line-endings-tp4840829p4841106.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Levente Uzonyi-2 wrote
It is but :e ++ff=mac helps.
I usually use the baffling `:%s/\r/\r/g` ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/line-endings-tp4840829p4841123.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Am 05.08.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com>:
Levente Uzonyi-2 wrote
It is but :e ++ff=mac helps.
I usually use the baffling `:%s/\r/\r/g`
I think you leave off the leading g I use :%s/<ctrl-v>/<ctrl-v>/ But annoying, yes. Norbert
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/line-endings-tp4840829p4841123.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We should indeed consider doing it, I believe Cuis has done the same. +1. It's a pain to have e.g. fileouts in vim squished into one massive line with special characters displayed.
stepharo wrote
But we should finish all the change we started :) +1 also :)
now if one guy or a bunch of guys send us code then we will integrate it :)
VisualWorks uses CR. I suspect that is because the original Smalltalk-80 did so. (I don't know what Squeak does. Is it CR, too?) -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/line-endings-tp4840829p4841133.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (8)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Levente Uzonyi -
Norbert Hartl -
Peter Uhnák -
Richard Sargent -
Sean P. DeNigris -
stepharo -
Sven Van Caekenberghe