[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10337
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
issue 884: Bookmorph removal. Thanks alain!
I think that something was wrong because BookMorph is still present after #10337. regarding SqueakPage removal. It seems to me that ObjectOut and MorphObjectOut would not be fonctional at all after SqueakPage and SqueakPageCache removal. I would remove all of this. (and in the case someone want to make it revive, it isn't lost) alain
Stef
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
I applied your slice and when I checked it removed BookLikeMorph Stef On Jun 13, 2009, at 10:39 PM, Alain Plantec wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
issue 884: Bookmorph removal. Thanks alain!
I think that something was wrong because BookMorph is still present after #10337.
regarding SqueakPage removal. It seems to me that ObjectOut and MorphObjectOut would not be fonctional at all after SqueakPage and SqueakPageCache removal. I would remove all of this. (and in the case someone want to make it revive, it isn't lost)
yes I know. sniff all fun stuff broken.
alain
Stef
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
can you check ? because book~LikeMorph and bookMorph in 320 were not in the same hierarchy anymore. Stef On Jun 13, 2009, at 10:39 PM, Alain Plantec wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
issue 884: Bookmorph removal. Thanks alain!
I think that something was wrong because BookMorph is still present after #10337.
regarding SqueakPage removal. It seems to me that ObjectOut and MorphObjectOut would not be fonctional at all after SqueakPage and SqueakPageCache removal. I would remove all of this. (and in the case someone want to make it revive, it isn't lost)
alain
Stef
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
can you check ? because book~LikeMorph and bookMorph in 320 were not in the same hierarchy anymore. checked, my slice didn't completely remove BookMorph. =-O my next will. alain Stef
On Jun 13, 2009, at 10:39 PM, Alain Plantec wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
issue 884: Bookmorph removal. Thanks alain!
I think that something was wrong because BookMorph is still present after #10337.
ok I prefer that than a merging bug. Stef On Jun 13, 2009, at 11:04 PM, Alain Plantec wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
can you check ? because book~LikeMorph and bookMorph in 320 were not in the same hierarchy anymore. checked, my slice didn't completely remove BookMorph. =-O my next will. alain Stef
On Jun 13, 2009, at 10:39 PM, Alain Plantec wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
issue 884: Bookmorph removal. Thanks alain!
I think that something was wrong because BookMorph is still present after #10337.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
ok I prefer that than a merging bug.
the LongTestCase >>#DecompilerTests method is touched by the BookMorph removal. Unfortunately, the class LongTestCase is unpackaged. I guess that is is the reason why it was not in the slice. -> new issue http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=888 Alain
Ok I will check that now with the initialize :) On Jun 14, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Alain Plantec wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
ok I prefer that than a merging bug.
the LongTestCase >>#DecompilerTests method is touched by the BookMorph removal. Unfortunately, the class LongTestCase is unpackaged. I guess that is is the reason why it was not in the slice. -> new issue http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=888 Alain
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Alain Plantec a écrit :
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
ok I prefer that than a merging bug.
the LongTestCase >>#DecompilerTests method is touched by the BookMorph removal. Unfortunately, the class LongTestCase is unpackaged. oups, this is the class DecompilerTests that is unpackaged and the method DecompilerTests>>decompilerDiscrepancies which is touched by the BookMorph removal. I guess that is is the reason why it was not in the slice. -> new issue http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=888 Alain
ok I will focus first on the initialize. Stef On Jun 14, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Alain Plantec wrote:
Alain Plantec a écrit :
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
ok I prefer that than a merging bug.
the LongTestCase >>#DecompilerTests method is touched by the BookMorph removal. Unfortunately, the class LongTestCase is unpackaged. oups, this is the class DecompilerTests that is unpackaged and the method DecompilerTests>>decompilerDiscrepancies which is touched by the BookMorph removal. I guess that is is the reason why it was not in the slice. -> new issue http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=888 Alain
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (2)
-
Alain Plantec -
Stéphane Ducasse