Thanks Denis Alexandre On 27 May 2011, at 09:12, Denis Kudriashov wrote:

Hello

See squeaksource wiki tab http://www.squeaksource.com/Mocketry.html

And tests with class name like Acceptance is good I think.

2011/5/27 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> Hi!

Following some discussion about Mocketry, I wanted to know more about it. I've found http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/publicRepository/Mocketry(Bundle).html

and the squeaksource project. I read the tests but this is a bit cryptic.

In 5 minutes, I couldn't find what it was exactly about. Any good url that google does not know about?

Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Note there's an HelpSystem book loaded with ConfigurationOfMocketry. Laurent. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Dennis Schetinin <chaetal@gmail.com> wrote:

BTW, I've provided a tiny example in VW thread: http://forum.world.st/Mocking-in-Unit-Tests-td3552082.html#a3554271

2011/5/27 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com>

...

Thanks Denis

Alexandre

On 27 May 2011, at 09:12, Denis Kudriashov wrote:

...

Hello

See squeaksource wiki tab http://www.squeaksource.com/Mocketry.html

And tests with class name like Acceptance is good I think.

2011/5/27 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> Hi!

Following some discussion about Mocketry, I wanted to know more about it. I've found http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/publicRepository/Mocketry(Bundle).html

and the squeaksource project. I read the tests but this is a bit cryptic.

In 5 minutes, I couldn't find what it was exactly about. Any good url that google does not know about?

Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

-- Dennis Schetinin

It means you can just run Mocketry tests with SUnit test runner, no modifications needed. Just as with "ordinary" tests, all verifications are performed "at place": SomeObjectTests >> testDoesSomething * 2 + 2 should equal: 4. *"Here it passes" * 2 + 2 should equal: 5. *"Here it fails" "Nothing else is needed" …Or, did I misunderstood your question? 2011/7/19 Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com>

I read that Mocketry is compatible with the SUnit test runner. How would one use it like this? call #verify at the end of a TestCaseSubclass>>testXxx?

Thanks. Sean

-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Mocketry-tp3555258p3676822.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- Dennis Schetinin

Yes, you can write it this way: SomeTests >> testXXX [:mock1 :mock2 | [mock1 someMessage. mock2 someMessage2] should strictly satisfy: [mock1 someMessage willReturn: 'some'. mock2 someMessage2] ] runScenario 2011/7/19 Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com>

Dennis Schetinin wrote:

...

It means you can just run Mocketry tests with SUnit test runner

I mean how does one use mocks specifically with SUnit. For example, from the HelpBook:

[:mock1 :mock2 | [mock1 someMessage. mock2 someMessage2] should strictly satisfy: [mock1 someMessage willReturn: 'some'. mock2 someMessage2]] runScenario

Where do I put that? Drop the whole thing including the #runScenario into a #testXxx or what?

Thanks. Sean

-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Mocketry-tp3555258p3677175.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- Dennis Schetinin