[Pharo-project] [update] #10507
10507 ----- Issue 945: Annoying bug: UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #mimeTypes Issue 1769: TestRunner author while running tests Issue 1772: testSymbolTableM6812 is failing Issue 1815: Monticello prints class definitions to the transcript while loading Issue 1841: Make the System -> Software update a preference for 1.0 Issue 1861: Use old network (note: to take effect you need to restart the image) Issue 1771: testFinalizationOfEquals sometimes fails and sometimes doesn't With this update, all pending 1.0 issues have been resolved and tests are green. If no new issues pop up soon, we are going to declare this version as RC2. Cheers, Adrian ___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
Great updated. I will build my images with this version from tonight on :-) Lukas 2010/1/21 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
10507 -----
Issue 945: Â Â Â Annoying bug: UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #mimeTypes Issue 1769: Â Â TestRunner author while running tests Issue 1772: Â Â testSymbolTableM6812 is failing Issue 1815: Â Â Monticello prints class definitions to the transcript while loading Issue 1841: Â Â Make the System -> Software update a preference for 1.0 Issue 1861: Â Â Use old network (note: to take effect you need to restart the image) Issue 1771: Â Â testFinalizationOfEquals sometimes fails and sometimes doesn't
With this update, all pending 1.0 issues have been resolved and tests are green.
If no new issues pop up soon, we are going to declare this version as RC2.
Cheers, Adrian ___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
Great updated. I will build my images with this version from tonight on :-)
Excellent. Tomorrow I build the PharoDev RC2 :)
Lukas
2010/1/21 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
10507 -----
Issue 945: Annoying bug: UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #mimeTypes Issue 1769: TestRunner author while running tests Issue 1772: testSymbolTableM6812 is failing Issue 1815: Monticello prints class definitions to the transcript while loading Issue 1841: Make the System -> Software update a preference for 1.0 Issue 1861: Use old network (note: to take effect you need to restart the image) Issue 1771: testFinalizationOfEquals sometimes fails and sometimes doesn't
With this update, all pending 1.0 issues have been resolved and tests are green.
If no new issues pop up soon, we are going to declare this version as RC2.
Cheers, Adrian ___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Adrian: I cannot update as I have the error "Can't find EOCD position" Can you upload the image to gforge? thanks Mariano On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
Great updated. I will build my images with this version from tonight on :-)
Excellent. Tomorrow I build the PharoDev RC2 :)
Lukas
2010/1/21 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
10507 -----
Issue 945: Annoying bug: UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #mimeTypes Issue 1769: TestRunner author while running tests Issue 1772: testSymbolTableM6812 is failing Issue 1815: Monticello prints class definitions to the transcript while loading Issue 1841: Make the System -> Software update a preference for 1.0 Issue 1861: Use old network (note: to take effect you need to restart the image) Issue 1771: testFinalizationOfEquals sometimes fails and sometimes doesn't
With this update, all pending 1.0 issues have been resolved and tests are green.
If no new issues pop up soon, we are going to declare this version as RC2.
Cheers, Adrian ___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Adrian: I cannot update as I have the error "Can't find EOCD position"
Can you upload the image to gforge?
I am uploading one now (as rc1, rc2 will have the cleanup scripts run and versionumber changed) Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
Thanks Marcus. Now it seems to work. The problem was that Squeaksource was down :) On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>wrote:
On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Adrian: I cannot update as I have the error "Can't find EOCD position"
Can you upload the image to gforge?
I am uploading one now (as rc1, rc2 will have the cleanup scripts run and versionumber changed)
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
cool! Stef On Jan 21, 2010, at 11:31 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
10507 -----
Issue 945: Annoying bug: UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #mimeTypes Issue 1769: TestRunner author while running tests Issue 1772: testSymbolTableM6812 is failing Issue 1815: Monticello prints class definitions to the transcript while loading Issue 1841: Make the System -> Software update a preference for 1.0 Issue 1861: Use old network (note: to take effect you need to restart the image) Issue 1771: testFinalizationOfEquals sometimes fails and sometimes doesn't
With this update, all pending 1.0 issues have been resolved and tests are green.
If no new issues pop up soon, we are going to declare this version as RC2.
Cheers, Adrian ___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
10507 -----
Issue 945: Annoying bug: UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #mimeTypes Issue 1769: TestRunner author while running tests Issue 1772: testSymbolTableM6812 is failing Issue 1815: Monticello prints class definitions to the transcript while loading Issue 1841: Make the System -> Software update a preference for 1.0 Issue 1861: Use old network (note: to take effect you need to restart the image) Issue 1771: testFinalizationOfEquals sometimes fails and sometimes doesn't
With this update, all pending 1.0 issues have been resolved and tests are green.
If no new issues pop up soon, we are going to declare this version as RC2.
Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1"
Cheers, Adrian ___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1"
yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some downloads per day. I will do that. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because
it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1"
yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some downloads per day.
Please, do it only for the core. For the dev image I want to wait a couple of days to see everything is more or less ok. Although I think the image is pretty stable (which was my most important and even unique objective) as the reported "issues" were not important and really only one issue which is present since a lot of time.. Cheers Mariano
I will do that.
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:55 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1"
yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some downloads per day.
Please, do it only for the core. For the dev image I want to wait a couple of days to see everything is more or less ok. Although I think the image is pretty stable (which was my most important and even unique objective) as the reported "issues" were not important and really only one issue which is present since a lot of time..
But what is the use of having people download the image before? The image linked was http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/25156/pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1.z... 356 downloads. Now it is http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/25397/Pharo1.0-10508-rc2dev10.01.2.z... with just 51 downloads. The core image is not linked from the downloads page. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:55 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>
wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home
because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1"
yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some downloads per day.
Please, do it only for the core. For the dev image I want to wait a couple of days to see everything is more or less ok. Although I think the image is pretty stable (which was my most important and even unique objective) as the reported "issues" were not important and really only one issue which is present since a lot of time..
But what is the use of having people download the image before? The image linked was
My idea was to build a Dev image only for BetaTesters. Those people who can help us to test and don't care if the image blows up in their face. Because it was easier, I upload that image in gforge and send the email to the list. However, my idea was to do the real ANN (to the rest of the people) and link in download section (so that final users can download it) once the image was already tested and without big problems. What do you think ?
http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/25156/pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1.z...
356 downloads.
Now it is
http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/25397/Pharo1.0-10508-rc2dev10.01.2.z...
with just 51 downloads.
The core image is not linked from the downloads page.
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
My idea was to build a Dev image only for BetaTesters. Those people who can help us to test and don't care if the image blows up in their face. Because it was easier, I upload that image in gforge and send the email to the list. However, my idea was to do the real ANN (to the rest of the people) and link in download section (so that final users can download it) once the image was already tested and without big problems.
What do you think ?
I think this makes no sense... :-) Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:26 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
My idea was to build a Dev image only for BetaTesters. Those people who can help us to test and don't care if the image blows up in their face. Because it was easier, I upload that image in gforge and send the email to the list. However, my idea was to do the real ANN (to the rest of the people) and link in download section (so that final users can download it) once the image was already tested and without big problems.
What do you think ?
I think this makes no sense... :-)
So to explain: waiting two days until making the link on the download page: ok. We did that. Not announcing it yet. Ok, we will announce when it's clear it's stable. But having people download an old image without the bug-fixes by default? No. We are already in Beta. Clearly marked. There is no need for a private, more secret special beta. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:26 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
My idea was to build a Dev image only for BetaTesters. Those people who
can help us to test and don't care if the image blows up in their face. Because it was easier, I upload that image in gforge and send the email to the list. However, my idea was to do the real ANN (to the rest of the people) and link in download section (so that final users can download it) once the image was already tested and without big problems.
What do you think ?
I think this makes no sense... :-)
So to explain: waiting two days until making the link on the download page: ok. We did that. Not announcing it yet. Ok, we will announce when it's clear it's stable. But having people download an old image without the bug-fixes by default? No.
We are already in Beta. Clearly marked. There is no need for a private, more secret special beta.
Ok. But those two days were in weekend :) But ok, maybe you are right.
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
So to explain: waiting two days until making the link on the download page: ok. We did that. Not announcing it yet. Ok, we will announce when it's clear it's stable. But having people download an old image without the bug-fixes by default? No.
We are already in Beta. Clearly marked. There is no need for a private, more secret special beta. What is a Release Candidate meant for?
Well, I think, it is meant to be downloaded and tested. After all, it is a RC, if it blows up in your face, then it is something you will report. At least that is the way it is done in the world of PHP. Several iterations, going from beta (for early adopters only, people living on the edge), to RCs with several iterations, where basically every one out there with a large code base is asked to test it extensively to get to a point where only minor issues remain. The last RC where no critical issues have been found will then be labeled as final x.y.0 release. And that only works, if RCs are actually tested by a large group of people. Best Stefan
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 3956 Fax: +32 2 629 3525
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Stefan Marr <pharo@stefan-marr.de> wrote:
So to explain: waiting two days until making the link on the download page: ok. We did that. Not announcing it yet. Ok, we will announce when it's clear it's stable. But having people download an old image without the bug-fixes by default? No.
We are already in Beta. Clearly marked. There is no need for a private, more secret special beta. What is a Release Candidate meant for?
Well, I think, it is meant to be downloaded and tested. After all, it is a RC, if it blows up in your face, then it is something you will report.
At least that is the way it is done in the world of PHP.
Several iterations, going from beta (for early adopters only, people living on the edge), to RCs with several iterations, where basically every one out there with a large code base is asked to test it extensively to get to a point where only minor issues remain. The last RC where no critical issues have been found will then be labeled as final x.y.0 release.
And that only works, if RCs are actually tested by a large group of people.
Ok...you convinced me. Ok...I am agree :) Thanks Stefan
Best Stefan
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr <http://soft.vub.ac.be/%7Esmarr> Phone: +32 2 629 3956 Fax: +32 2 629 3525
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1"
yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some downloads per day.
I will do that.
Done: http://www.pharo-project.org/home http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
El dom, 24-01-2010 a las 21:58 +0100, Marcus Denker escribió:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1"
yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some downloads per day.
I will do that.
Done:
It is necessary to put a sources file download link in the pharo download page. The dev image zip already contains it. I think that it should be in the PharoCore section that it doesn't contains it. Cheers
http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
El dom, 24-01-2010 a las 18:31 -0600, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez escribió:
El dom, 24-01-2010 a las 21:58 +0100, Marcus Denker escribió:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1"
yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some downloads per day.
I will do that.
Done:
It is necessary to put a sources file download link in the pharo download page. The dev image zip already contains it.
I think that it should be in the PharoCore section that it doesn't contains it.
I was wrong. Both the dev image zip and the PharoCore zip include the sources file. So maybe this link shouldn't appear on the download page, just in the inria gforge page. cheers
Cheers
http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
participants (7)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Lukas Renggli -
Marcus Denker -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez -
Stefan Marr -
Stéphane Ducasse