+ 1

Le 10-03-2014 à 16:48, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> a écrit :

Ben,

I don't think that makes that much sense (right now):

- there is not that much spec specific traffic - spec is a fundamental and critical part of pharo - pharo is a fundamental and critical part of spec - we have to make spec better all together

;-)

My 2c,

Sven

...

On 10 Mar 2014, at 18:23, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello guys :)

I was wondering if it will make sense to have a spec dedicated mailing list :) As I have pros and cons, I am asking for your opinion :)

Thanks in advance, Ben

Are those "+1" meant for "yes a dedicated mailling list" or for sven's " I don't think that makes much sense" comment ? even if you don't want to do something directly with spec (and so, you wouldn't follow that mailinglist), many changes done for spec have an influence on common tools or morphic components. +1 (for svens comment). 2014-03-11 9:02 GMT+01:00 Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de>:

+1

...

Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. März 2014 um 03:46 Uhr Von: "Alexandre Bergel" <alexandre.bergel@me.com> An: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] About a Spec dedicated mailing-list

+ 1

...

Le 10-03-2014 à 16:48, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> a écrit :

Ben,

I don't think that makes that much sense (right now):

- there is not that much spec specific traffic - spec is a fundamental and critical part of pharo - pharo is a fundamental and critical part of spec - we have to make spec better all together

;-)

My 2c,

Sven

...

On 10 Mar 2014, at 18:23, Benjamin < benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello guys :)

I was wondering if it will make sense to have a spec dedicated mailing list :) As I have pros and cons, I am asking for your opinion :)

Thanks in advance, Ben