Re: [Pharo-project] PharoKernel #12159
Ok I see and yes it would be good to be able to decouple that from the kernel. Let us know when you have something. BTW igor is it not possible to achieve the same with a class extension? On Sep 30, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded the new version of PharoKernel
https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27540/PharoKernel-1.2-12159.zip
The Compression package is now part of the kernel image because the CompiledMethodTrailer requires it. It is on the next discussion whether we should keep this state. As the result the image is more dirty now.
I started the refactoring of CompiledMethodTrailers, but didn't finish it so far. The code is mostly complete, but untested and the migration/integration code is totally missing. I added a class for every kind of trailer, so the trailers which depend on the Compression package can be moved to the Compression package if the refactoring is ready and accepted.
Levente
I added some code that enables to download primitive packages and run SUnit tests. So it will be possible to create automatically the images with Network and Monticello (after some fixing of this packages).
Cheers, -- Pavel
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (1)
-
Stéphane Ducasse