Peter Uhnák wrote

http://forum.world.st/IMPORTANT-iceberg-home-changed-tp4944480p4944684.html

I still don't understand :/ What benefit justifies the complexity of multiple organizations? Isn't the concept of GH orgs inherently and specifically to host multiple projects?! ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

On 2 Oct 2017, at 17:33, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:

2017-10-02 17:26 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com <mailto:sean@clipperadams.com>>: Peter Uhnák wrote

...

http://forum.world.st/IMPORTANT-iceberg-home-changed-tp4944480p4944684.html <http://forum.world.st/IMPORTANT-iceberg-home-changed-tp4944480p4944684.html>

I still don't understand :/

Me too :) I think it was not actually discussed and explained. At least linked thread not describes it.

not everything can be discussed, but it was explained (in that link, it is explained very well): - it is easier to organise related work into teams (for example: iceberg, libgit2 bindings, filetree and now tonel) than to have everything on same team. - is also a marketing stuff: more groups of pharo related stuff in github. - it is also an easy choice: if that does not works, is very easy to change and group everything (but today I still think it was a good decision) Esteban

What benefit justifies the complexity of multiple organizations? Isn't the concept of GH orgs inherently and specifically to host multiple projects?!

----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html <http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html>

2017-10-02 18:53 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:

On 2 Oct 2017, at 17:33, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:

2017-10-02 17:26 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com>:

...

Peter Uhnák wrote

...

http://forum.world.st/IMPORTANT-iceberg-home-changed- tp4944480p4944684.html

I still don't understand :/

Me too :) I think it was not actually discussed and explained. At least linked thread not describes it.

not everything can be discussed, but it was explained (in that link, it is explained very well): - it is easier to organise related work into teams (for example: iceberg, libgit2 bindings, filetree and now tonel) than to have everything on same team. - is also a marketing stuff: more groups of pharo related stuff in github. - it is also an easy choice: if that does not works, is very easy to change and group everything (but today I still think it was a good decision)

I am missing this summary. Thank's. Now github supports teems inside organization. Will not it be better?

Esteban

...

What benefit justifies the complexity of multiple organizations? Isn't the concept of GH orgs inherently and specifically to host multiple projects?!

----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html