Re: [Pharo-project] Quicktime and MP3 harvested from Sophie
On Aug 16, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 16 August 2011 14:33, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
frank wrote:
Meaning that anything ripped out of Sophie 1.0 should be (or is, rather) >covered by an MIT licence, rather than Sophie 2.0's licence. Which is a good >thing!
Sophie 2.0 is ECL: http://www.sophie2.org/users/licensing.html Sophie 1.0 is BSD: http://www.futureofthebook.org/sophie/about/license
Where did you read about MIT?`
BSD, MIT. They're pretty much identical. Anyway, I should have said "BSD".
But identical is not the same. As soon as we ad Sophie code, we need to add the Sophie license to the license of Pahro. And than the whole license story gets one notch more complicated again. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
Marcus Denker-4 wrote:
As soon as we add Sophie code, we need to add the Sophie license to the license of Pahro.
I assumed we were just talking about making in loadable and useful, not adding it to the image. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Quicktime-and-MP3-harvested-from-Sophie-tp3747203p3747... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (2)
-
Marcus Denker -
Sean P. DeNigris