Could you use a metacello configuration named SciPharo composed of packaged that you would pick from a more neutral repository? 2016-03-04 8:28 GMT+01:00 Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-dev < pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org>:

---------- Message transféré ---------- From: Benoit St-Jean <bstjean@yahoo.com> To: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Cc: Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 07:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Call about Numerical Methods in Pharo :) Why just don't we honor Didier H. Besset and leave it as it was, Numerical Methods in Smalltalk?

That way, regardless of your favorite Smalltalk implementation, there will always be a "Numerical Methods in Smalltalk" package somewhere!

The same way there's no GlorpPharo : it's Glorp everywhere!

----------------- Benoît St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Twitter: @BenLeChialeux Pinterest: benoitstjean IRC: lamneth Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein)

------------------------------ *From:* Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> *To:* Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 1:43 PM *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-dev] Call about Numerical Methods in Pharo :)

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:

...

SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV. What is so much pharo specific in this library? Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split?

We can think of a more neutral name. Any idea for a new name ?

Regards,

-- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/