changed the subject :-) Michael On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Michael Roberts <mike@mjr104.co.uk> wrote:

I just wanted to add that I agree the change is currently at the wrong level. Whilst the change was done with the best intentions, and in the best spirit of what Pharo is trying to be, the impact on the user was not obvious until it was live. I wanted to load the cryptography package so that I could play with the Amazon cloud stuff. I get exactly the same warning and it is a disruption. I agree with the thread that said this should be a code critic rule, and / or there is some control over when the warnings are raised. I also saw that Doru was having issues with it as well in another thread. I'm all for change, but in this case we need to be more sophisticated about it.

thanks, Mike

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:

...

Ok

...

...

Lets discuss this monday.

:)

...

I am not against change, but this chagne is *at the wrong level*.

I don't want RB Lint to do the check in the browser (maybe later), it can be done just the same it is now done in the classbuilder, just in the browser. That's where we want it, as it talks to the user.

Why not then. My gut feeling is that we should have LARGE warning when also saving or loading code. Consistency can be a good thing

_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project