30222 ----- 11017 Eye inspector and Object explorer not compatible https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11017 11012 Object>>isComplex is related to complex number https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11012 11016 Failing Inspector Tests https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11016 11020 Setting an upper limit for HandMorph while dragging https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11020 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/ToolsTest-MarcusDenker.denker.... http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Tools-MarcusDenker.1154.diff http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Inspector-MarcusDenker.38... http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Settings-Polymorph-MarcusDenke... http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Morphic-Base-MarcusDenker.22.d... http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1496.diff
On 26 juin 2013, at 13:18, Marcus Denker wrote:
11012 Object>>isComplex is related to complex number https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11012
This one is a duplicate of issue 10971. 10971 also remove Number>>#arg that is a nonsense in the absence of complex numbers.
On Jun 26, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Camille Teruel <camille.teruel@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 juin 2013, at 13:18, Marcus Denker wrote:
11012 Object>>isComplex is related to complex number https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11012
This one is a duplicate of issue 10971. 10971 also remove Number>>#arg that is a nonsense in the absence of complex numbers.
Why was 10971 closed? Marcus
On 26 juin 2013, at 13:30, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Jun 26, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Camille Teruel <camille.teruel@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 juin 2013, at 13:18, Marcus Denker wrote:
11012 Object>>isComplex is related to complex number https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11012
This one is a duplicate of issue 10971. 10971 also remove Number>>#arg that is a nonsense in the absence of complex numbers.
Why was 10971 closed?
Because I'm a fool I guess :) It was an error.
Marcus
participants (2)
-
Camille Teruel -
Marcus Denker