Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: About (backwards) Compatibility
On 2012-12-23, at 15:39, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 23 December 2012 11:16, Andreas.Raab <andreas.raab@gmx.de> wrote:
Igor Stasenko wrote
yes, i want string math, because at the end, everything you type into machine is strings, so having objects, classes or compiled methods seems like overcomplication, when you can do the same by just using stings.. We definitely should reconsider "everything is an object" postulate, instead we should postulate "everything is string", otherwise smalltalk will never be a successful platform like javascript/perl etc.
oh, yes, and while we're changing that, please add the 'math' precedence rules, because my math teacher is the school told me that this is the only right way they should be processed, oh, and at last, lets use curly braces syntax because it is sooo convenient.
Could you move your trolling attempts to the pharo list please?
First. It was not trolling attempt, but sarcasm attempt. :)
I thought it was funny :)
Second. The topic was originally from pharo list. I don't know why people moved discussion it on squeak-dev list. I just replying. But thanks for reminder that i am not welcome here anymore.
Nah, you are most certainly welcome. Andreas was just misreading you. - Bert -
participants (1)
-
Bert Freudenberg