something else than a stupi timestamp in pane of the glamour workspace.... please
something else than a stupi timestamp in pane of the glamour workspace.... please please please please. It gives this impression that pharo is not finished at all.
That's because this part is not finished :). It should come, hopefully before the feature freeze. Otherwise, we can treat it as a bug :D Doru On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:52 PM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
something else than a stupi timestamp in pane of the glamour workspace.... please please please please. It gives this impression that pharo is not finished at all.
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
Do I put 'Pane 1' instead of this timestamp and it took me around 15 s to do it. So I guess that this is possible to propose a simple fix, isn't Stef Le 18/2/15 21:27, Tudor Girba a écrit :
That's because this part is not finished :). It should come, hopefully before the feature freeze. Otherwise, we can treat it as a bug :D
Doru
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:52 PM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr <mailto:stepharo@free.fr>> wrote:
something else than a stupi timestamp in pane of the glamour workspace.... please please please please. It gives this impression that pharo is not finished at all.
-- www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
"Every thing has its own flow"
+1 for this. The timestamp is ugly and not very readable. Actually, one of the first things I did with my image was to change GTPlayPage>>initialize to something like: initialize content := ''. title := String streamContents: [ :s | DateAndTime now printHMSOn: s. ] but 'Pane 1', 'Pane 2' etc. would work too. Best regards, Piotr Klibert 2015-02-19 9:11 GMT+01:00 stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:
Do I put 'Pane 1' instead of this timestamp and it took me around 15 s to do it. So I guess that this is possible to propose a simple fix, isn't
Stef
Le 18/2/15 21:27, Tudor Girba a écrit :
That's because this part is not finished :). It should come, hopefully before the feature freeze. Otherwise, we can treat it as a bug :D
Doru
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:52 PM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
something else than a stupi timestamp in pane of the glamour workspace.... please please please please. It gives this impression that pharo is not finished at all.
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
If there is only one pane there shouldn't be a tab header at all. Norbert
Am 18.02.2015 um 20:52 schrieb stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:
something else than a stupi timestamp in pane of the glamour workspace.... please please please please. It gives this impression that pharo is not finished at all.
I think the idea is that each workspace, even each snapshot of it, is uniquely identified. The question remains if the label and the identifier have to be the same.
On 19 Feb 2015, at 11:47, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
If there is only one pane there shouldn't be a tab header at all.
Norbert
Am 18.02.2015 um 20:52 schrieb stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:
something else than a stupi timestamp in pane of the glamour workspace.... please please please please. It gives this impression that pharo is not finished at all.
On 19 Feb 2015, at 11:47, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
If there is only one pane there shouldn't be a tab header at all.
+1
Norbert
Am 18.02.2015 um 20:52 schrieb stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:
something else than a stupi timestamp in pane of the glamour workspace.... please please please please. It gives this impression that pharo is not finished at all.
participants (6)
-
Esteban Lorenzano -
Norbert Hartl -
Piotr Klibert -
stepharo -
Sven Van Caekenberghe -
Tudor Girba