[Pharo-project] could it be possible to have a setting to get the old shortcut for
implementor, sender, users? Because I spent 10 minutes and I still cannot find how I get all the references to a class :( I'm I know I'm old and stupid but we should not forget that what makes the success of pharo is happy users. Stef
on Linux keyboard: Alt+Shift+n On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
implementor, sender, users?
Because I spent 10 minutes and I still cannot find how I get all the references to a class :(
I'm I know I'm old and stupid but we should not forget that what makes the success of pharo is happy users.
Stef
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr
wrote:
implementor, sender, users?
Because I spent 10 minutes and I still cannot find how I get all the references to a class :(
cmd+b+shift+n hehehehe
I'm I know I'm old and stupid but we should not forget that what makes the success of pharo is happy users.
Stef
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
That's why there is a tool in Nautilus which shows all the shortcuts and their description We shouldn't forgot either that not changing stuff just because are used to it is not a valid argument Ben On Jul 28, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
implementor, sender, users?
Because I spent 10 minutes and I still cannot find how I get all the references to a class :(
I'm I know I'm old and stupid but we should not forget that what makes the success of pharo is happy users.
Stef
Thanks. Now b, N in the menu item is not clear Then this is one of the most frequent query with implementor and senders and now it is quite difficult to do. especially the Cmd + shift I really think that we should change it. On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Benjamin wrote:
That's why there is a tool in Nautilus which shows all the shortcuts and their description
<Screen shot 2012-07-28 at 9.59.45 PM.png>
We shouldn't forgot either that not changing stuff just because are used to it is not a valid argument
Ben
On Jul 28, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
implementor, sender, users?
Because I spent 10 minutes and I still cannot find how I get all the references to a class :(
I'm I know I'm old and stupid but we should not forget that what makes the success of pharo is happy users.
Stef
It always has been cmd+shift+N :) Ben On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Thanks. Now b, N in the menu item is not clear Then this is one of the most frequent query with implementor and senders and now it is quite difficult to do. especially the Cmd + shift I really think that we should change it.
On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Benjamin wrote:
That's why there is a tool in Nautilus which shows all the shortcuts and their description
<Screen shot 2012-07-28 at 9.59.45 PM.png>
We shouldn't forgot either that not changing stuff just because are used to it is not a valid argument
Ben
On Jul 28, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
implementor, sender, users?
Because I spent 10 minutes and I still cannot find how I get all the references to a class :(
I'm I know I'm old and stupid but we should not forget that what makes the success of pharo is happy users.
Stef
yes but with cmd+B in front this much more painful On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Benjamin wrote:
It always has been cmd+shift+N :)
Ben
On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Thanks. Now b, N in the menu item is not clear Then this is one of the most frequent query with implementor and senders and now it is quite difficult to do. especially the Cmd + shift I really think that we should change it.
On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Benjamin wrote:
That's why there is a tool in Nautilus which shows all the shortcuts and their description
<Screen shot 2012-07-28 at 9.59.45 PM.png>
We shouldn't forgot either that not changing stuff just because are used to it is not a valid argument
Ben
On Jul 28, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
implementor, sender, users?
Because I spent 10 minutes and I still cannot find how I get all the references to a class :(
I'm I know I'm old and stupid but we should not forget that what makes the success of pharo is happy users.
Stef
so may be a goo trick would be to add cmd b cmd u for users (since r is taken by reference) Stef On Jul 29, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
yes but with cmd+B in front this much more painful
On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Benjamin wrote:
It always has been cmd+shift+N :)
Ben
On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Thanks. Now b, N in the menu item is not clear Then this is one of the most frequent query with implementor and senders and now it is quite difficult to do. especially the Cmd + shift I really think that we should change it.
On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Benjamin wrote:
That's why there is a tool in Nautilus which shows all the shortcuts and their description
<Screen shot 2012-07-28 at 9.59.45 PM.png>
We shouldn't forgot either that not changing stuff just because are used to it is not a valid argument
Ben
On Jul 28, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
implementor, sender, users?
Because I spent 10 minutes and I still cannot find how I get all the references to a class :(
I'm I know I'm old and stupid but we should not forget that what makes the success of pharo is happy users.
Stef
Why not :) Ben On Jul 29, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
so may be a goo trick would be to add cmd b cmd u for users (since r is taken by reference)
Stef
On Jul 29, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
yes but with cmd+B in front this much more painful
On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Benjamin wrote:
It always has been cmd+shift+N :)
Ben
On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Thanks. Now b, N in the menu item is not clear Then this is one of the most frequent query with implementor and senders and now it is quite difficult to do. especially the Cmd + shift I really think that we should change it.
On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Benjamin wrote:
That's why there is a tool in Nautilus which shows all the shortcuts and their description
<Screen shot 2012-07-28 at 9.59.45 PM.png>
We shouldn't forgot either that not changing stuff just because are used to it is not a valid argument
Ben
On Jul 28, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
implementor, sender, users?
Because I spent 10 minutes and I still cannot find how I get all the references to a class :(
I'm I know I'm old and stupid but we should not forget that what makes the success of pharo is happy users.
Stef
participants (4)
-
Benjamin -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Pavel Krivanek -
Stéphane Ducasse