[Pharo-project] about condenseChanges
Hi marcus/others I did a condenseChanges and I'm planning to issue a new image. I wanted to avoid to put it in the stream of updates because since it takes a long time everybody can be penalized but at the same time we will not have the same flow if we start from 1.0 and press update. Thoughts? Stef
On May 19, 2010, at 2:05 33PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi marcus/others
I did a condenseChanges and I'm planning to issue a new image. I wanted to avoid to put it in the stream of updates because since it takes a long time everybody can be penalized but at the same time we will not have the same flow if we start from 1.0 and press update. Thoughts?
Stef Is it really necessary? The difference in a zipped archive together with the image is a meager 1.2MB. I personally really don't mind the 5MB extra of spent diskspace for the uncondensed .changes file...
Cheers, Henry
Yes I thought about that too. Now I done it to remove strange compiled methods floating around. Stef On May 19, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On May 19, 2010, at 2:05 33PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi marcus/others
I did a condenseChanges and I'm planning to issue a new image. I wanted to avoid to put it in the stream of updates because since it takes a long time everybody can be penalized but at the same time we will not have the same flow if we start from 1.0 and press update. Thoughts?
Stef Is it really necessary? The difference in a zipped archive together with the image is a meager 1.2MB. I personally really don't mind the 5MB extra of spent diskspace for the uncondensed .changes file...
Cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On May 19, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Yes I thought about that too. Now I done it to remove strange compiled methods floating around.
But that's done with #cleanUpForRelease.... it removes all changesets, then the CMs that are referenced by them are GCed. Marcus
Stef
On May 19, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On May 19, 2010, at 2:05 33PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi marcus/others
I did a condenseChanges and I'm planning to issue a new image. I wanted to avoid to put it in the stream of updates because since it takes a long time everybody can be penalized but at the same time we will not have the same flow if we start from 1.0 and press update. Thoughts?
Stef Is it really necessary? The difference in a zipped archive together with the image is a meager 1.2MB. I personally really don't mind the 5MB extra of spent diskspace for the uncondensed .changes file...
Cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
participants (3)
-
Henrik Johansen -
Marcus Denker -
Stéphane Ducasse