PharoVM building with Pharo3
Hi, I adapted sources for generating VM to build with Pharo3 (so we stay in sync). https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/view/4.0-VM/ and even wrote a post about it :P http://smallworks.eu/web/blog/2014-05-28-generate-vm-with-pharo3 cheers, Esteban ps: there is a small problem with windows builds, but thatâs not because of the problem but some clean needed in the jenkins slave
Good work and thanks for sharing! IMO, answering the pseudo category '--all--' among regular categories was really a design mistake of Pharo 3.0 and should better be reverted. Message #categories has been designed as a compatibility layer, but it is not really compatible. The current workaround is to replace it with a new alternate message #realCategories. If we have to patch each and every external package (not counting base image patches like https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13093/File-Out-save-each-method-twice-From...) this is kind of ruining the idea of compatibility and gives extra work to everybody and un-necessary break compatibility with Squeak. 2014-05-28 20:24 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
Hi,
I adapted sources for generating VM to build with Pharo3 (so we stay in sync).
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/view/4.0-VM/
and even wrote a post about it :P
http://smallworks.eu/web/blog/2014-05-28-generate-vm-with-pharo3
cheers, Esteban
ps: there is a small problem with windows builds, but thatâs not because of the problem but some clean needed in the jenkins slave
participants (2)
-
Esteban Lorenzano -
Nicolas Cellier