[Pharo-project] Zeroconf and Windows: recommended environment?
I am using MobaXterm (http://mobaxterm.mobatek.net/) on Windows to have a Unix-like environment. Thing is that the shell there is bash but all utilities (like unzip etc) are based on busybox (http://www.busybox.net/). This means that not all options are available. Also, the $OS variable looks like to give Windows_NT, which then leads to the "Unsupported OS" message (for the VM for example). What is the environment you guys do use for testing those scripts on Windows (Windows 7 in my case)? Thanks in advance, Phil
On 2013-05-05, at 10:43, "phil@highoctane.be" <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
I am using MobaXterm (http://mobaxterm.mobatek.net/) on Windows to have a Unix-like environment.
Thing is that the shell there is bash but all utilities (like unzip etc) are based on busybox (http://www.busybox.net/).
This means that not all options are available.
Also, the $OS variable looks like to give Windows_NT, which then leads to the "Unsupported OS" message (for the VM for example).
What is the environment you guys do use for testing those scripts on Windows (Windows 7 in my case)?
we run everything under mingw, but I can add (yet) another switch to test for windows. Currently I check already for *windows* *mingw* and we can add *cygwin* or maybe I should just use *win*? :) => can you open a bug report? I'll look into it later this day
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10532 2013/5/5 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com>
On 2013-05-05, at 10:43, "phil@highoctane.be" <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
I am using MobaXterm (http://mobaxterm.mobatek.net/) on Windows to have a Unix-like environment.
Thing is that the shell there is bash but all utilities (like unzip etc) are based on busybox (http://www.busybox.net/).
This means that not all options are available.
Also, the $OS variable looks like to give Windows_NT, which then leads to the "Unsupported OS" message (for the VM for example).
What is the environment you guys do use for testing those scripts on Windows (Windows 7 in my case)?
we run everything under mingw, but I can add (yet) another switch to test for windows.
Currently I check already for *windows* *mingw* and we can add *cygwin* or maybe I should just use *win*? :)
=> can you open a bug report? I'll look into it later this day
participants (2)
-
Camillo Bruni -
phil＠highoctane.be