[Pharo-project] Source code comments in Pharo: lots of missing things
Just a question: while looking at the comments for classes in the browser, there are often missing entries, even for pretty classic classes. How comes? I find myself with a Squeak image running in parallel just to look up some content. So, content that makes sense is available but didn't got carried over to pharo. Is this a licencing issue? Something else? I have pharo1.0.sources so comments do show where they are available. Also, some methods look like a decompile with t1 t2.. where the source exists in Squeak with the proper parameters. Thanks in advance for shining some light in the topic. Philippe
On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:58 PM, philippe.back@highoctane.be wrote:
Just a question: while looking at the comments for classes in the browser, there are often missing entries, even for pretty classic classes. How comes?
Because the classes were not commented.
I find myself with a Squeak image running in parallel just to look up some content. So, content that makes sense is available but didn't got carried over to pharo.
Which classes? Because we improved this aspect.
Is this a licencing issue? Something else? I have pharo1.0.sources so comments do show where they are available. Also, some methods look like a decompile with t1 t2..
Strange normally we do not have decompiled code.
where the source exists in Squeak with the proper parameters.
Thanks in advance for shining some light in the topic.
Stef
Quite a few in morphic for example aren't commented anymore. Phil Le 27 mars 2012 18:28, "Stéphane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> a écrit :
On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:58 PM, philippe.back@highoctane.be wrote:
Just a question: while looking at the comments for classes in the browser, there are often missing entries, even for pretty classic classes. How comes?
Because the classes were not commented.
I find myself with a Squeak image running in parallel just to look up some content. So, content that makes sense is available but didn't got carried over to pharo.
Which classes? Because we improved this aspect.
Is this a licencing issue? Something else? I have pharo1.0.sources so comments do show where they are available. Also, some methods look like a decompile with t1 t2..
Strange normally we do not have decompiled code.
where the source exists in Squeak with the proper parameters.
Thanks in advance for shining some light in the topic.
Stef
participants (3)
-
phil＠highoctane.be -
philippe.back＠highoctane.be -
Stéphane Ducasse