Hi, I tested ArbitraryPrecisionFloat in Pharo3.0 where it works OK. I prepared a Metacello ConfigurationOfArbitraryPrecisionFloat at obsolescent http://www.squeaksource.com/MetacelloRepository How am I supposed to add an entry in MetaRepoForPharo30, should someone give me access?
I tried to copy it, but your config does not declare a #stable version, which is necessary for the configuration browser. To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of the Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that. On 16 Mar 2014, at 01:17, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, I tested ArbitraryPrecisionFloat in Pharo3.0 where it works OK. I prepared a Metacello ConfigurationOfArbitraryPrecisionFloat at obsolescent http://www.squeaksource.com/MetacelloRepository How am I supposed to add an entry in MetaRepoForPharo30, should someone give me access?
Nicolas, On 16 Mar 2014, at 10:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of the Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that.
I now see that 'nice' is part of 'Pharo', so I think you should be able to save to MetaRepoForPharo30. Sven
2014-03-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
Nicolas,
On 16 Mar 2014, at 10:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of the Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that.
I now see that 'nice' is part of 'Pharo', so I think you should be able to save to MetaRepoForPharo30.
Thanks, I think I messed up when entering my credentials... I have now published with a symbolic stable version.
Sven
nicolas was already committer there :) On 16 Mar 2014, at 19:49, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
- I can give you access but I need your account name - on the class side there is a reference to "ExtendedNumberParser" which is not part of Pharo
Bye T.
Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. März 2014 um 17:31 Uhr Von: "Nicolas Cellier" <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> An: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Adding a new catalog entry
2014-03-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>: Nicolas,
On 16 Mar 2014, at 10:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of the Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that.
I now see that 'nice' is part of 'Pharo', so I think you should be able to save to MetaRepoForPharo30.
Thanks, I think I messed up when entering my credentials... I have now published with a symbolic stable version.
Sven
2014-03-16 19:49 GMT+01:00 Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de>:
Hi Nicolas,
- I can give you access but I need your account name
Thanks Torsten, I have already access
- on the class side there is a reference to "ExtendedNumberParser" which is not part of Pharo
Yes, I messed up with the Configuration using #'pharo3.0' instead of #'pharo3.0.x'. This should be fixed now (I hope). For my superficial knowledge of Metacello, discovering the right incantation is like black magic...
Bye T.
*Gesendet:* Sonntag, 16. März 2014 um 17:31 Uhr *Von:* "Nicolas Cellier" <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> *An:* "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> *Betreff:* Re: [Pharo-dev] Adding a new catalog entry
2014-03-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
Nicolas,
On 16 Mar 2014, at 10:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of the Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that.
I now see that 'nice' is part of 'Pharo', so I think you should be able to save to MetaRepoForPharo30.
Thanks, I think I messed up when entering my credentials... I have now published with a symbolic stable version.
Sven
- I can give you access but I need your account name
Thanks Torsten, I have already access
- on the class side there is a reference to "ExtendedNumberParser" which is not part of Pharo
Yes, I messed up with the Configuration using #'pharo3.0' instead of #'pharo3.0.x'. This should be fixed now (I hope). For my superficial knowledge of Metacello, discovering the right incantation is like black magicâ¦
well we will have to clean and simplify all that in the future. This is why versionner should be good so that people use it and we can simplify the declarations. Stef
Bye T.
Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. März 2014 um 17:31 Uhr Von: "Nicolas Cellier" <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> An: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Adding a new catalog entry
2014-03-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>: Nicolas,
On 16 Mar 2014, at 10:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of the Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that.
I now see that 'nice' is part of 'Pharo', so I think you should be able to save to MetaRepoForPharo30.
Thanks, I think I messed up when entering my credentials... I have now published with a symbolic stable version.
Sven
2014-03-16 22:27 GMT+01:00 Pharo4Stef <pharo4Stef@free.fr>:
- I can give you access but I need your account name
Thanks Torsten, I have already access
- on the class side there is a reference to "ExtendedNumberParser" which is not part of Pharo
Yes, I messed up with the Configuration using #'pharo3.0' instead of #'pharo3.0.x'. This should be fixed now (I hope). For my superficial knowledge of Metacello, discovering the right incantation is like black magic...
well we will have to clean and simplify all that in the future. This is why versionner should be good so that people use it and we can simplify the declarations.
Stef
But I had the feeling that Versionner UI is currently very limited vs Metacello options (especially w.r.t. cross dialect support) Or do you have a different POV, like only Pharo3.0 stuff should go to MetaRepoForPharo3.0, and the ConfigurationOf... should be expunged from any other dialect/version ?
Bye T.
*Gesendet:* Sonntag, 16. März 2014 um 17:31 Uhr *Von:* "Nicolas Cellier" <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> *An:* "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> *Betreff:* Re: [Pharo-dev] Adding a new catalog entry
2014-03-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
Nicolas,
On 16 Mar 2014, at 10:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of the Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that.
I now see that 'nice' is part of 'Pharo', so I think you should be able to save to MetaRepoForPharo30.
Thanks, I think I messed up when entering my credentials... I have now published with a symbolic stable version.
Sven
On 16 Mar 2014, at 22:44, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
Or do you have a different POV, like only Pharo3.0 stuff should go to MetaRepoForPharo3.0, and the ConfigurationOf... should be expunged from any other dialect/version ?
MetaRepoForPharo3 should only contain configurations that load/work without problems in Pharo 3 and that are/will be supported. Of course, if a configuration contains supports for other platforms as well, that is OK.
2014-03-16 23:56 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
On 16 Mar 2014, at 22:44, Nicolas Cellier < nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
Or do you have a different POV, like only Pharo3.0 stuff should go to MetaRepoForPharo3.0, and the ConfigurationOf... should be expunged from any other dialect/version ?
MetaRepoForPharo3 should only contain configurations that load/work without problems in Pharo 3 and that are/will be supported.
Of course, if a configuration contains supports for other platforms as well, that is OK.
Yes, I see that is the current practice. But I mean one could imagine another workflow: - an automated tool extracts pharoX.Y configuration from a multi-dialect configuration This is what is published in MetaRepoForPharoX.Y (maybe a pharoX.Y user don't care that much about squeakZ.T or gemstone nor of a very old version dedicated to Pharo0.1) - the pharoX.Y only configuration is managed via a simple Versionner UI and committed into MetaRepoForPharoX.Y in short cycle until it works well enough - an automated tool merge pharoX.Y configuration back into multi-dialect configuration stored somewhere else I don't think the 1st item is difficult (doesn't Metacello does exactly that when loading) 2nd item is almost what you have currently with Versionner. The 3rd item is the difficult point, it would have to track differences between dialectA and dialectB or dialect version X and dialect version Z, but also consistency of package baselines and versions. However I'm sure automation would be a great improvment in this area (compared to manual dissection of configuration).
well we will have to clean and simplify all that in the future. This is why versionner should be good so that people use it and we can simplify the declarations.
Stef
But I had the feeling that Versionner UI is currently very limited vs Metacello options (especially w.r.t. cross dialect support)
The problem is that metacello is too complex. :) And the API could be better.
Or do you have a different POV, like only Pharo3.0 stuff should go to MetaRepoForPharo3.0, and the ConfigurationOf... should be expunged from any other dialect/version ?
For now this is ok to have multiple dialects in the metarepo because people may want to have gemstone and squeak version. Now for the core Pharo tool configruations should be as simple as possible (RB, â¦) Stef
Bye T.
Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. März 2014 um 17:31 Uhr Von: "Nicolas Cellier" <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> An: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Adding a new catalog entry
2014-03-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>: Nicolas,
On 16 Mar 2014, at 10:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of the Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that.
I now see that 'nice' is part of 'Pharo', so I think you should be able to save to MetaRepoForPharo30.
Thanks, I think I messed up when entering my credentials... I have now published with a symbolic stable version.
Sven
2014-03-17 10:15 GMT+01:00 Pharo4Stef <pharo4Stef@free.fr>:
well we will have to clean and simplify all that in the future.
This is why versionner should be good so that people use it and we can simplify the declarations.
Stef
But I had the feeling that Versionner UI is currently very limited vs Metacello options (especially w.r.t. cross dialect support)
The problem is that metacello is too complex. :) And the API could be better.
Agree, see my other reply to Sven. An alternative is to - keep UI simple (mostly as it is now) by focusing onto single dialect/single dialect version - to automate the single dialect extract and cross dialect merge But maybe it's easier to say than do ;)
Or do you have a different POV, like only Pharo3.0 stuff should go to MetaRepoForPharo3.0, and the ConfigurationOf... should be expunged from any other dialect/version ?
For now this is ok to have multiple dialects in the metarepo because people may want to have gemstone and squeak version. Now for the core Pharo tool configruations should be as simple as possible (RB, ...)
Stef
Bye T.
*Gesendet:* Sonntag, 16. März 2014 um 17:31 Uhr *Von:* "Nicolas Cellier" <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> *An:* "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> *Betreff:* Re: [Pharo-dev] Adding a new catalog entry
2014-03-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
Nicolas,
On 16 Mar 2014, at 10:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of the Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that.
I now see that 'nice' is part of 'Pharo', so I think you should be able to save to MetaRepoForPharo30.
Thanks, I think I messed up when entering my credentials... I have now published with a symbolic stable version.
Sven
participants (4)
-
Nicolas Cellier -
Pharo4Stef -
Sven Van Caekenberghe -
Torsten Bergmann