Directory structure on files.pharo.org
This looks like it is missing directories. On the other hand, perhaps exposing the build steps as directories might not be the best idea, as that is unlikely to remain stable. http://files.pharo.org/image/70/ Stephan
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:55 AM, stephan <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
This looks like it is missing directories. On the other hand, perhaps exposing the build steps as directories might not be the best idea, as that is unlikely to remain stable. http://files.pharo.org/image/70/
Yeh, also so far people will use mostly the latest minimal and full images. All intermediate steps are stored just because we can. But if you have some idea/proposal on how to enhance it, we could do it
Stephan
-- Guille Polito Research Engineer French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr* <http://www.cnrs.fr> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
On 11-09-17 11:18, Guillermo Polito wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:55 AM, stephan <stephan@stack.nl <mailto:stephan@stack.nl>> wrote:
This looks like it is missing directories. On the other hand, perhaps exposing the build steps as directories might not be the best idea, as that is unlikely to remain stable. http://files.pharo.org/image/70/ <http://files.pharo.org/image/70/>
Yeh, also so far people will use mostly the latest minimal and full images. All intermediate steps are stored just because we can.
But if you have some idea/proposal on how to enhance it, we could do it
Indeed, I also assume most people will be looking for either the minimal or the full image, in either 32 or 64 bit. Would it be better to add a subdirectory for the (intermediary) build steps? Stephan
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:36 AM, stephan <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
On 11-09-17 11:18, Guillermo Polito wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:55 AM, stephan <stephan@stack.nl <mailto: stephan@stack.nl>> wrote:
This looks like it is missing directories. On the other hand, perhaps exposing the build steps as directories might not be the best idea, as that is unlikely to remain stable. http://files.pharo.org/image/70/ <http://files.pharo.org/image/70/>
Yeh, also so far people will use mostly the latest minimal and full images. All intermediate steps are stored just because we can.
But if you have some idea/proposal on how to enhance it, we could do it
Indeed, I also assume most people will be looking for either the minimal or the full image, in either 32 or 64 bit. Would it be better to add a subdirectory for the (intermediary) build steps?
What and where we upload is in here: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/blob/development/bootstrap/scripts/up...
Stephan
-- Guille Polito Research Engineer French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr* <http://www.cnrs.fr> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
participants (2)
-
Guillermo Polito -
stephan