[Pharo-project] pharo-contribution CI server
I just create a new jenkins instance https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/ The goal is to keep https://ci.inria.fr/pharo as clean and green as possible. Everything that is experimental and not explicitly supported by the pharo code team should go to the pharo-contribution server. I hope to finish the setup this evening. best cami
Great! Cheers, Doru On Feb 3, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
I just create a new jenkins instance
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/
The goal is to keep https://ci.inria.fr/pharo as clean and green as possible. Everything that is experimental and not explicitly supported by the pharo code team should go to the pharo-contribution server.
I hope to finish the setup this evening.
best cami
-- www.tudorgirba.com "It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."
looks like I managed to get all jenkins plugin up and running. I will migrate all non-pharo jobs to https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/ tomorrow. Mainly this includes: - Rizel - Phobos - Pharo-2.0-Kernel - CogDroid On 2013-02-03, at 20:06, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Great!
Cheers, Doru
On Feb 3, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
I just create a new jenkins instance
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/
The goal is to keep https://ci.inria.fr/pharo as clean and green as possible. Everything that is experimental and not explicitly supported by the pharo code team should go to the pharo-contribution server.
I hope to finish the setup this evening.
best cami
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."
On 2013-02-03, at 21:39, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 3, 2013, at 9:35 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
- Pharo-2.0-Kernel - CogDroid
why this two are not pharo? because we do not maintain them? I think they are important for us
who maintains them, that is indeed the question. If they turn red, who can fix them? - Pharo 2.0 Kernel is basically red - CogDroid is red as well Did I ever hear any complaints? No, so they are not used nor maintained by us! => they go on pharo-contributions where they can grow until they are stable Everything under https://ci.inria.fr/pharo has to be green, otherwise it is bad publicity. Stuff under pharo-contribution can have any state, preferably green of course, but we do not care. Of course if we have people in our team that volunteer to run and fix the builds I am happy to keep them under /pharo. But otherwise it's just additional work
+ 1 After we can contact the cogdroid maintainer to see if he wants. Stef
On 2013-02-03, at 21:39, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 3, 2013, at 9:35 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
- Pharo-2.0-Kernel - CogDroid
why this two are not pharo? because we do not maintain them? I think they are important for us
who maintains them, that is indeed the question. If they turn red, who can fix them?
- Pharo 2.0 Kernel is basically red - CogDroid is red as well
Did I ever hear any complaints? No, so they are not used nor maintained by us! => they go on pharo-contributions where they can grow until they are stable
Everything under https://ci.inria.fr/pharo has to be green, otherwise it is bad publicity. Stuff under pharo-contribution can have any state, preferably green of course, but we do not care.
Of course if we have people in our team that volunteer to run and fix the builds I am happy to keep them under /pharo. But otherwise it's just additional work
Chrstophe completed most of the migration, I contacted the maintainers, and I will kill the old jobs this week On 2013-02-04, at 15:46, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
+ 1
After we can contact the cogdroid maintainer to see if he wants.
Stef
On 2013-02-03, at 21:39, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 3, 2013, at 9:35 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
- Pharo-2.0-Kernel - CogDroid
why this two are not pharo? because we do not maintain them? I think they are important for us
who maintains them, that is indeed the question. If they turn red, who can fix them?
- Pharo 2.0 Kernel is basically red - CogDroid is red as well
Did I ever hear any complaints? No, so they are not used nor maintained by us! => they go on pharo-contributions where they can grow until they are stable
Everything under https://ci.inria.fr/pharo has to be green, otherwise it is bad publicity. Stuff under pharo-contribution can have any state, preferably green of course, but we do not care.
Of course if we have people in our team that volunteer to run and fix the builds I am happy to keep them under /pharo. But otherwise it's just additional work
participants (4)
-
Camillo Bruni -
Esteban Lorenzano -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba