[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20569
20569 ----- Issue 7499: Write a Pharo20.sources (code changes) http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7499 Diff information: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Traits-MarcusDenker.462.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/System-Support-MarcusDenker.792.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Collections-Streams-MarcusDenker.131.diff
Should we setup a job building sources now? :) On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>wrote:
20569 -----
Issue 7499: Write a Pharo20.sources (code changes) http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7499
Diff information: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Traits-MarcusDenker.462.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/System-Support-MarcusDenker.792.diff
http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Collections-Streams-MarcusDenker.131.diff
On Feb 25, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:
Should we setup a job building sources now? :)
Yes. Maybe as part of the regression test job? And we need to actually do the condense and write the 2.0 sources⦠I added a new issue for that.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote: 20569 -----
Issue 7499: Write a Pharo20.sources (code changes) http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7499
Diff information: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Traits-MarcusDenker.462.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/System-Support-MarcusDenker.792.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Collections-Streams-MarcusDenker.131.diff
Why doesn't it work in CogVM? Is condenseChanges ok now too? -- Pavel On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:
Should we setup a job building sources now? :)
Yes. Maybe as part of the regression test job? And we need to actually do the condense and write the 2.0 sources⦠I added a new issue for that.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
20569 -----
Issue 7499: Write a Pharo20.sources (code changes) http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7499
Diff information: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Traits-MarcusDenker.462.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/System-Support-MarcusDenker.792.diff
http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Collections-Streams-MarcusDenker.131.diff
On Feb 25, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:
Why doesn't it work in CogVM?
because we become: methods when installing a new trailer and cog does not support become: on active methods.
Is condenseChanges ok now too?
I personally think we should not care. In 3.0 we really need get rid of this overly horrible .sources and .changes monster for something trivially simplistic. We saved *a lot* on our Moore's Bank account the last years⦠at some point it is time to invest that. Keep in mind that available RAM will double again until we release 3.0⦠Marcus
On 2013-02-25, at 14:23, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:
Why doesn't it work in CogVM?
because we become: methods when installing a new trailer and cog does not support become: on active methods.
Is condenseChanges ok now too?
I personally think we should not care. In 3.0 we really need get rid of this overly horrible .sources and .changes monster for something trivially simplistic.
We saved *a lot* on our Moore's Bank account the last years⦠at some point it is time to invest that. Keep in mind that available RAM will double again until we release 3.0â¦
I am always impressed when I think about that :D... and even more when I see how little memory we actually use :P
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>wrote:
On Feb 25, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:
Why doesn't it work in CogVM?
because we become: methods when installing a new trailer and cog does not support become: on active methods.
It does now. I fixed this last week.
Is condenseChanges ok now too?
I personally think we should not care. In 3.0 we really need get rid of this overly horrible .sources and .changes monster for something trivially simplistic.
We saved *a lot* on our Moore's Bank account the last years⦠at some point it is time to invest that. Keep in mind that available RAM will double again until we release 3.0â¦
Marcus
-- best, Eliot
On Feb 25, 2013, at 10:01 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:
Why doesn't it work in CogVM?
because we become: methods when installing a new trailer and cog does not support become: on active methods.
It does now. I fixed this last week.
no, it still does not works completely... but now it has a clear message and exit, instead a crash :)
Is condenseChanges ok now too?
I personally think we should not care. In 3.0 we really need get rid of this overly horrible .sources and .changes monster for something trivially simplistic.
We saved *a lot* on our Moore's Bank account the last years⦠at some point it is time to invest that. Keep in mind that available RAM will double again until we release 3.0â¦
Marcus
-- best, Eliot
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>wrote:
On Feb 25, 2013, at 10:01 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>wrote:
On Feb 25, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:
Why doesn't it work in CogVM?
because we become: methods when installing a new trailer and cog does not support become: on active methods.
It does now. I fixed this last week.
no, it still does not works completely... but now it has a clear message and exit, instead a crash :)
reproducible test case, please :)
Is condenseChanges ok now too?
I personally think we should not care. In 3.0 we really need get rid of this overly horrible .sources and .changes monster for something trivially simplistic.
We saved *a lot* on our Moore's Bank account the last years⦠at some point it is time to invest that. Keep in mind that available RAM will double again until we release 3.0â¦
Marcus
-- best, Eliot
-- best, Eliot
participants (6)
-
Camillo Bruni -
Eliot Miranda -
Esteban Lorenzano -
Guillermo Polito -
Marcus Denker -
Pavel Krivanek