[Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Hi, We've been working on a new code repository & project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub. If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub). Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? Cheers, Doru On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote:
Hi,
We've been working on a new code repository & project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub.
If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub).
Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html
Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Being happy is a matter of choice."
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there?
There is nothing at the moment to migrate. I guess you'll just have to move your packages from squeaksource to smalltalkhub, so a simple script could do the trick. Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas Petton <petton.nicolas@gmail.com>wrote:
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there?
There is nothing at the moment to migrate.
I guess you'll just have to move your packages from squeaksource to smalltalkhub, so a simple script could do the trick.
This is awesome. THanks ESUG! And the history? I mean, is this a new front end for a squeaksource server ? thanks
Cheers, Nicolas
-- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Excellent ! It's time to move past squeaksource.com. Would be nice to know the features that will be offered, at least in comparison with current squeaksource (besides the image crashing, and bothering the always helpful Bern phd students). Fernando On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas Petton <petton.nicolas@gmail.com> wrote:
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there?
There is nothing at the moment to migrate.
I guess you'll just have to move your packages from squeaksource to smalltalkhub, so a simple script could do the trick.
This is awesome. THanks ESUG!
And the history? I mean, is this a new front end for a squeaksource server ?
thanks
Cheers, Nicolas
-- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
What we ask is: - scripting api so that we do not have to click click click click but write programs - tagging of projects - management of projects (admin I want to be able to tag projects with students and do not see them). - handling of ^%$$%&*#^&*^$&$* long list of any items - in the future: a solid backend Basically we need scalability at the interface level. Now INRIA gracefully will offer a real back up of data (replicated in three different labs) and people will be able to use smalltalkhub and burn the machine processors :). Stef On Apr 6, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote:
Excellent ! It's time to move past squeaksource.com.
Would be nice to know the features that will be offered, at least in comparison with current squeaksource (besides the image crashing, and bothering the always helpful Bern phd students).
Fernando
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas Petton <petton.nicolas@gmail.com> wrote:
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there?
There is nothing at the moment to migrate.
I guess you'll just have to move your packages from squeaksource to smalltalkhub, so a simple script could do the trick.
This is awesome. THanks ESUG!
And the history? I mean, is this a new front end for a squeaksource server ?
thanks
Cheers, Nicolas
-- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Wow, looks great! I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years... Cheers, Adrian On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there?
Cheers, Doru
On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote:
Hi,
We've been working on a new code repository & project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub.
If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub).
Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html
Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Wow, looks great!
I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years...
+1 But providing a tool/script so that we know how to migrate manually our own projects is a nice nice nice wish :)
Cheers, Adrian
On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there?
Cheers, Doru
On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote:
Hi,
We've been working on a new code repository & project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub.
If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub).
Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html
Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
But you have the tool: Gofer :) Stef On Apr 6, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote: Wow, looks great!
I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years...
+1 But providing a tool/script so that we know how to migrate manually our own projects is a nice nice nice wish :)
Cheers, Adrian
On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there?
Cheers, Doru
On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote:
Hi,
We've been working on a new code repository & project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub.
If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub).
Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html
Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
On 06. 04. 2011 18:34, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Wow, looks great!
I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years...
But still there can be something good and valuable. I'd migrate that with some #archive tag or something. The same goes with code from other Smalltalks. Like Smalltalk Goodies archive back from 90's, there are quite some interesting code, which I'm still using. Best regards Janko
Cheers, Adrian
On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there?
Cheers, Doru
On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote:
Hi,
We've been working on a new code repository & project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub.
If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub).
Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html
Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
-- Janko Mivšek Aida/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si
Hi, Unless there is a scalability issue, I would not discard anything from squeaksource. I believe the evolution is too valuable to simply drop it. But, maybe there are practical reasons. In any case, the idea of having programatic access is really cool. I would love to use that for analysis purposes. Cheers, Doru On 6 Apr 2011, at 18:46, Janko Mivšek wrote:
On 06. 04. 2011 18:34, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Wow, looks great!
I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years...
But still there can be something good and valuable. I'd migrate that with some #archive tag or something.
The same goes with code from other Smalltalks. Like Smalltalk Goodies archive back from 90's, there are quite some interesting code, which I'm still using.
Best regards Janko
Cheers, Adrian
On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there?
Cheers, Doru
On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote:
Hi,
We've been working on a new code repository & project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub.
If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub).
Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html
Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
-- Janko Mivšek Aida/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si
-- www.tudorgirba.com "One cannot do more than one can do."
Hi,
Unless there is a scalability issue, I would not discard anything from squeaksource. I believe the evolution is too valuable to simply drop it.
But, maybe there are practical reasons.
May be we could have a second server where we copy everything there. We will see how we will manage that. The query are important because we can identify created but unused created but dormant created but not used ... and tag them
In any case, the idea of having programatic access is really cool. I would love to use that for analysis purposes.
:) I did not guess on that one :) and with the new EyeSee we may expect to have some cool looking infrastructure.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor.girba@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Unless there is a scalability issue, I would not discard anything from squeaksource. I believe the evolution is too valuable to simply drop it.
But, maybe there are practical reasons.
In any case, the idea of having programatic access is really cool. I would love to use that for analysis purposes.
Yes you are right, it might be difficult to say what is important and what is not. If you take the example of github and look at the explore dashboard here: https://github.com/explore you see only repositories with a lot of activities or the trendiest one. I guess there is also a lot of repositories non active or dormant on github also and nobody cares about that. You just need enough disk space ;-) Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
"Janko" == Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek@eranova.si> writes:
I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years...
Janko> But still there can be something good and valuable. I'd migrate that Janko> with some #archive tag or something. It's not like Squeaksource is going away any time soon. Remember, Pharo isn't the *only* Squeak out there. If the Pharo team wants to move off Squeaksource, that's great! We were already talking about how to tag various packages as "squeak-only" or "pharo-only". This simplifies that. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote:
"Janko" == Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek@eranova.si> writes:
I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years...
Janko> But still there can be something good and valuable. I'd migrate that Janko> with some #archive tag or something.
It's not like Squeaksource is going away any time soon.
Remember, Pharo isn't the *only* Squeak out there. Â If the Pharo team wants to move off Squeaksource, that's great! Â We were already talking about how to tag various packages as "squeak-only" or "pharo-only". This simplifies that.
Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Regards. -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Â Sorry.
There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Nicolas forget about that i guess. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Serge> <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Â Sorry.
Serge> There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Serge> Nicolas forget about that i guess. OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the "tagging" issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Serge> <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Â Sorry.
Serge> There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Serge> Nicolas forget about that i guess.
OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the "tagging" issue comes up again. Â How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? Â And can we maintain forks for those things that require it?
At the code level, you can manage several Squeak/Pharo branchs with the help of Metacello. At the repository level, i dunno if this possible to use this kind of information for the web site. And i guess not every projects use (or want to use) Metacello, so suitable tags might be needed. There is no obligation for every communities or projects to be on SmalltalkHub, like every git repositories is not on github. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
Randal, Managing packages on a per platform basis is one of the things that Metacello was designed to do ... Dale On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Serge> <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry.
Serge> There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Serge> Nicolas forget about that i guess.
OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the "tagging" issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it?
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
.. and I see Metacello as a nice next step for SmalltalkHub: Metacello based projects can be regarded as: serious, maintained, trustful,.. in any case, those projects will be separated by itself from all other code. So we won't need to care much about those not much useful code in the repository... Janko On 07. 04. 2011 05:23, Dale Henrichs wrote:
Randal,
Managing packages on a per platform basis is one of the things that Metacello was designed to do ...
Dale
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Serge> <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry.
Serge> There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Serge> Nicolas forget about that i guess.
OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the "tagging" issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it?
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
-- Janko Mivšek Svetovalec za informatiko Eranova d.o.o. Ljubljana, Slovenija www.eranova.si tel: 01 514 22 55 faks: 01 514 22 56 gsm: 031 674 565
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the "tagging" issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it?
That's where the ConfigurationOf...'s and Metacello come in to ensure dependencies, versions and Smalltalk implementations. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/SmalltalkHub-going-beta-in-a-week-tp3430480p3432602.ht... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
"Geert" == Geert Claes <geert.wl.claes@gmail.com> writes:
Geert> That's where the ConfigurationOf...'s and Metacello come in to ensure Geert> dependencies, versions and Smalltalk implementations. I guess I'm thinking more of development. The question we were facing about Squeaksource (and don't yet know if this applies to SmalltalkHub) is how I as a developer keep my Squeak contributions separate from the same package being developed for Pharo for the packages that overlap but require different versions. Is there some way of tagging a Monticello package in SmalltalkHub as to which releases the development line is intended for? Note that I've just barely woken up, so if this sounds as confusing as it is to me right now, it probably is confused. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
El mié, 06-04-2011 a las 19:48 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz escribió:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Serge> <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry.
Serge> There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Serge> Nicolas forget about that i guess.
OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the "tagging" issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it?
Isn't the responsibility of the repository. The repository only stores code. Just like svn or github. You can use other features to "emulate" and adapt it to your needs (like the tags) but that isn't a feature of the repo. Indeed is the task of the maintainer of the code to mark some versions as tested and ok on some versions of Squeak or Pharo. Currently, in Pharo, that job is done in Metacello configurations. Cheers -- Miguel Cobá http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 19:38 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz a écrit :
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry.
Hi Randal, You should blame me for that. Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
El mié, 06-04-2011 a las 19:38 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz escribió:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> writes:
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry.
That is because there isn't an announcement yet. It only mentioned that a beta could be made available next week. I suppose that then an announcement will be made. -- Miguel Cobá http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
Cool! I guess you didn't you use JTalkST (too young), did you? On 6 avr. 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote:
Hi,
We've been working on a new code repository & project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub.
If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub).
Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html
Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
Noury
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 20:30 +0200, Noury Bouraqadi a écrit :
Cool! I guess you didn't you use JTalkST (too young), did you?
No, it's too young to be used in real world apps. Maybe in the future ;) cheers, Nico -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
participants (13)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Dale Henrichs -
Fernando Olivero -
Geert Claes -
Janko Mivšek -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
merlyn＠stonehenge.com -
Miguel Cobá -
Nicolas Petton -
Noury Bouraqadi -
Serge Stinckwich -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba