On 1 November 2010 05:33, Levente Uzonyi <leves@elte.hu> wrote:

On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Igor Stasenko wrote:

...

On 1 November 2010 05:04, Levente Uzonyi <leves@elte.hu> wrote:

snip

...

...

foo ; bar ;; baz ; foo ;; bar ; baz.

this is incorrect syntax.

This is correct: ((self foo; bar) baz; foo) bar; baz. Message chaining should be equivalent with this, shouldn't it?

yes, but continuation err.. chaining ';;' takes precedence before cascade ';' which means that you can write only as: self foo zork ;; bar ;; bum ; baz ; lz but not self foo zork ; bar ;; bum ; baz ;; lz otherwise you will also need to use parens to disambiguate nested cascades.

Levente

-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.