Is it safe to replace the Launcher VM with the one required for Pharo 6.1? I.e. is that VM backward compatible with a Pharo 6.0 image? ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Launcher-and-Pharo-6-1-tp4957770.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Sean,
On Jul 29, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Is it safe to replace the Launcher VM with the one required for Pharo 6.1? I.e. is that VM backward compatible with a Pharo 6.0 image?
In general, Squeak/Pharo VMs are backwards compatible at least within a major version.
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Launcher-and-Pharo-6-1-tp4957770.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, Yes as Eliot said, it is safe. 6.1 just includes latest bug fixes from Eliot + a new version of libgit2 Esteban
On 30 Jul 2017, at 05:59, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Sean,
On Jul 29, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Is it safe to replace the Launcher VM with the one required for Pharo 6.1? I.e. is that VM backward compatible with a Pharo 6.0 image?
In general, Squeak/Pharo VMs are backwards compatible at least within a major version.
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Launcher-and-Pharo-6-1-tp4957770.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
EstebanLM wrote
it is safe. 6.1
Great. Thanks, guys. I downloaded a new vm via `curl get.pharo.org/vm61 | bash` and it seems to be working fine with 6.0 images. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Launcher-and-Pharo-6-1-tp4957770p4958036.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (3)
-
Eliot Miranda -
Esteban Lorenzano -
Sean P. DeNigris