[Pharo-project] SkipList
Hi, 20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and SkipListNode... I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)... I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external loadable package... but better to ask to the community first :) Comments are welcome. Thanks Gabriel
Hi Gabriel, Yes, it was also my intention to remove SkipList from the core. Not sure whether it makes sense to create an external package. Anybody using SkipList? If there is no interest, I would not create it. Its not lost as you can always go back and extract it from Squeak or an earlier version of Pharo. Cheers, Adrian On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:01 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Hi,
20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and SkipListNode...
I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)...
I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external loadable package... but better to ask to the community first :)
Comments are welcome.
Thanks Gabriel _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
That remind me http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127168.htm... I proposed already to move SkipList in Squeaksource/Squeakmap and still agree on this ( http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127217.htm... ) Ken Causey has shown good willing to do it at that time, but did not proceed, I don't remember why... Maybe because he could not decide about the license, or waited for author agreement? Ah yes, see: http://tunes.org/~nef//logs/squeak/08.04.04 So, who will take that job? Nicolas 2009/6/3 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
Hi Gabriel,
Yes, it was also my intention to remove SkipList from the core.
Not sure whether it makes sense to create an external package. Anybody using SkipList? If there is no interest, I would not create it. Its not lost as you can always go back and extract it from Squeak or an earlier version of Pharo.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:01 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Hi,
20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and SkipListNode...
I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)...
I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external loadable package... but better to ask to the community first :)
Comments are welcome.
Thanks Gabriel _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Me or adrian :) Stef On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
That remind me http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127168.htm... I proposed already to move SkipList in Squeaksource/Squeakmap and still agree on this ( http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127217.htm... )
Ken Causey has shown good willing to do it at that time, but did not proceed, I don't remember why... Maybe because he could not decide about the license, or waited for author agreement? Ah yes, see: http://tunes.org/~nef//logs/squeak/08.04.04
So, who will take that job?
Nicolas
2009/6/3 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
Hi Gabriel,
Yes, it was also my intention to remove SkipList from the core.
Not sure whether it makes sense to create an external package. Anybody using SkipList? If there is no interest, I would not create it. Its not lost as you can always go back and extract it from Squeak or an earlier version of Pharo.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:01 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Hi,
20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and SkipListNode...
I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)...
I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external loadable package... but better to ask to the community first :)
Comments are welcome.
Thanks Gabriel _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
I meant that we will remove it. stef On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Me or adrian :)
Stef
On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
That remind me http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127168.htm... I proposed already to move SkipList in Squeaksource/Squeakmap and still agree on this ( http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127217.htm... )
Ken Causey has shown good willing to do it at that time, but did not proceed, I don't remember why... Maybe because he could not decide about the license, or waited for author agreement? Ah yes, see: http://tunes.org/~nef//logs/squeak/08.04.04
So, who will take that job?
Nicolas
2009/6/3 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
Hi Gabriel,
Yes, it was also my intention to remove SkipList from the core.
Not sure whether it makes sense to create an external package. Anybody using SkipList? If there is no interest, I would not create it. Its not lost as you can always go back and extract it from Squeak or an earlier version of Pharo.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:01 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Hi,
20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and SkipListNode...
I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)...
I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external loadable package... but better to ask to the community first :)
Comments are welcome.
Thanks Gabriel _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Ok... seems that are ok to remove that... If nobody take this I can do that. On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>wrote:
I meant that we will remove it. stef On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Me or adrian :)
Stef
On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
That remind me http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127168.htm... I proposed already to move SkipList in Squeaksource/Squeakmap and still agree on this ( http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127217.htm... )
Ken Causey has shown good willing to do it at that time, but did not proceed, I don't remember why... Maybe because he could not decide about the license, or waited for author agreement? Ah yes, see: http://tunes.org/~nef//logs/squeak/08.04.04<http://tunes.org/%7Enef//logs/squeak/08.04.04>
So, who will take that job?
Nicolas
2009/6/3 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
Hi Gabriel,
Yes, it was also my intention to remove SkipList from the core.
Not sure whether it makes sense to create an external package. Anybody using SkipList? If there is no interest, I would not create it. Its not lost as you can always go back and extract it from Squeak or an earlier version of Pharo.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:01 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Hi,
20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and SkipListNode...
I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)...
I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external loadable package... but better to ask to the community first :)
Comments are welcome.
Thanks Gabriel _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Gabriel, I think its easier if Stef or I will do it when we prepare the next update. Like this you don't need to spend time dealing with MC or a changeset for this simple removal. I'd prefer your work on the harder licensing stuff ;) Cheers, Adrian On Jun 3, 2009, at 21:55 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Ok... seems that are ok to remove that... If nobody take this I can do that.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>wrote:
I meant that we will remove it. stef On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Me or adrian :)
Stef
On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
That remind me http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127168.htm... I proposed already to move SkipList in Squeaksource/Squeakmap and still agree on this ( http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127217.htm... )
Ken Causey has shown good willing to do it at that time, but did not proceed, I don't remember why... Maybe because he could not decide about the license, or waited for author agreement? Ah yes, see: http://tunes.org/~nef//logs/squeak/08.04.04<http://tunes.org/%7Enef//logs/squeak/08.04.04
So, who will take that job?
Nicolas
2009/6/3 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
Hi Gabriel,
Yes, it was also my intention to remove SkipList from the core.
Not sure whether it makes sense to create an external package. Anybody using SkipList? If there is no interest, I would not create it. Its not lost as you can always go back and extract it from Squeak or an earlier version of Pharo.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:01 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Hi,
20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and SkipListNode...
I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)...
I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external loadable package... but better to ask to the community first :)
Comments are welcome.
Thanks Gabriel _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Ok... so I continue with the other stuff... On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Gabriel, I think its easier if Stef or I will do it when we prepare the next update. Like this you don't need to spend time dealing with MC or a changeset for this simple removal. I'd prefer your work on the harder licensing stuff ;)
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 21:55 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Ok... seems that are ok to remove that... If nobody take this I can do that.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>wrote:
I meant that we will remove it. stef On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Me or adrian :)
Stef
On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
That remind me
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127168.htm...
I proposed already to move SkipList in Squeaksource/Squeakmap and still agree on this (
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127217.htm...
)
Ken Causey has shown good willing to do it at that time, but did not proceed, I don't remember why... Maybe because he could not decide about the license, or waited for author agreement? Ah yes, see: http://tunes.org/~nef//logs/squeak/08.04.04<http://tunes.org/%7Enef//logs/squeak/08.04.04> <http://tunes.org/%7Enef//logs/squeak/08.04.04
So, who will take that job?
Nicolas
2009/6/3 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
Hi Gabriel,
Yes, it was also my intention to remove SkipList from the core.
Not sure whether it makes sense to create an external package. Anybody using SkipList? If there is no interest, I would not create it. Its not lost as you can always go back and extract it from Squeak or an earlier version of Pharo.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:01 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Hi,
20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and SkipListNode...
I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)...
I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external loadable package... but better to ask to the community first :)
Comments are welcome.
Thanks Gabriel _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
you can SKIP it from LIST hahaha ;) 2009/6/3 Gabriel Cotelli <g.cotelli@gmail.com>
Ok... so I continue with the other stuff...
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Gabriel, I think its easier if Stef or I will do it when we prepare the next update. Like this you don't need to spend time dealing with MC or a changeset for this simple removal. I'd prefer your work on the harder licensing stuff ;)
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 21:55 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Ok... seems that are ok to remove that... If nobody take this I can do that.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>wrote:
I meant that we will remove it. stef On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Me or adrian :)
Stef
On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
That remind me
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127168.htm...
I proposed already to move SkipList in Squeaksource/Squeakmap and still agree on this (
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127217.htm...
)
Ken Causey has shown good willing to do it at that time, but did not proceed, I don't remember why... Maybe because he could not decide about the license, or waited for author agreement? Ah yes, see: http://tunes.org/~nef//logs/squeak/08.04.04<http://tunes.org/%7Enef//logs/squeak/08.04.04> <http://tunes.org/%7Enef//logs/squeak/08.04.04
So, who will take that job?
Nicolas
2009/6/3 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
Hi Gabriel,
Yes, it was also my intention to remove SkipList from the core.
Not sure whether it makes sense to create an external package. Anybody using SkipList? If there is no interest, I would not create it. Its not lost as you can always go back and extract it from Squeak or an earlier version of Pharo.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:01 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Hi,
20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and SkipListNode...
I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)...
I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external loadable package... but better to ask to the community first :)
Comments are welcome.
Thanks Gabriel _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
don;t be that bored at your job :) On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
you can SKIP it from LIST hahaha ;)
2009/6/3 Gabriel Cotelli <g.cotelli@gmail.com> Ok... so I continue with the other stuff...
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote: Gabriel, I think its easier if Stef or I will do it when we prepare the next update. Like this you don't need to spend time dealing with MC or a changeset for this simple removal. I'd prefer your work on the harder licensing stuff ;)
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 21:55 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Ok... seems that are ok to remove that... If nobody take this I can do that.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>wrote:
I meant that we will remove it. stef On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Me or adrian :)
Stef
On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
That remind me http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127168.htm... I proposed already to move SkipList in Squeaksource/Squeakmap and still agree on this ( http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127217.htm... )
Ken Causey has shown good willing to do it at that time, but did not proceed, I don't remember why... Maybe because he could not decide about the license, or waited for author agreement? Ah yes, see: http://tunes.org/~nef//logs/squeak/08.04.04<http://tunes.org/%7Enef//logs/squeak/08.04.04
So, who will take that job?
Nicolas
2009/6/3 Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch>:
Hi Gabriel,
Yes, it was also my intention to remove SkipList from the core.
Not sure whether it makes sense to create an external package. Anybody using SkipList? If there is no interest, I would not create it. Its not lost as you can always go back and extract it from Squeak or an earlier version of Pharo.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:01 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Hi,
20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and SkipListNode...
I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)...
I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external loadable package... but better to ask to the community first :)
Comments are welcome.
Thanks Gabriel _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (5)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Gabriel Cotelli -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Nicolas Cellier -
Stéphane Ducasse