There are two repos: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PharoExtras/RewriteTool , which seems to have been forked some time ago and http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun/RewriteTool/ , which is now about 70 commits ahead of the first! What should be done? ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/RewriteTool-tp4824877.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun/RewriteTool/ , which is now about 70 commits ahead of the first!
Alarmingly, Mark's repo seems to only be intermittently available. Many times sthub returns 404... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/RewriteTool-tp4824877p4824881.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
* Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> [06.05.2015. @12:26:49 -0700]:
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun/RewriteTool/ , which is now about 70 commits ahead of the first!
Alarmingly, Mark's repo seems to only be intermittently available. Many times sthub returns 404...
----- Cheers, Sean
For that, it is the trailing / => http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun/RewriteTool works Jean-Christophe
Nope, not found. Even using the search box on STH Phil On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Jean-Christophe Bach < jeanchristophe.bach@inria.fr> wrote:
* Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> [06.05.2015. @12:26:49 -0700]:
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun/RewriteTool/ , which is now about 70 commits ahead of the first!
Alarmingly, Mark's repo seems to only be intermittently available. Many times sthub returns 404...
----- Cheers, Sean
For that, it is the trailing / => http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun/RewriteTool works
Jean-Christophe
* phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be> [07.05.2015. @09:28:45 +0200]:
Nope, not found. Even using the search box on STH
Phil
Well, I have just tried and⦠I think it is a "Schrödinger project": it is available and not available. Few minutes ago, it was available, now not anymore. JC
Maybe this could be linked to some mongotalk issues with connections in the pools. I've had some in my app and had to make sure all handles were right before a lot of the calls. Phil On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Jean-Christophe Bach < jeanchristophe.bach@inria.fr> wrote:
* phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be> [07.05.2015. @09:28:45 +0200]:
Nope, not found. Even using the search box on STH
Phil
Well, I have just tried and⦠I think it is a "Schrödinger project": it is available and not available. Few minutes ago, it was available, now not anymore.
JC
* Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> [06.05.2015. @12:23:09 -0700]:
There are two repos: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PharoExtras/RewriteTool , which seems to have been forked some time ago and http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun/RewriteTool/ , which is now about 70 commits ahead of the first!
What should be done?
----- Cheers, Sean
The right one should be the fork which was done to integrate Mark's work. But Mark is committing one its own repo, therefore the PharoExtras one should be updated. Mark, could you do it and then use the pharoextras repo? Thx, Jean-Christophe
Hi! I will update the PharoExtras/RewriteTool repo soon. The interesting thing is, that on page http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun, it shows me that I have zero projects. I hope it's not permanently and just some kind of bug:) Mark -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/RewriteTool-tp4824877p4825022.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mark Rizun wrote
I will update the PharoExtras/RewriteTool repo soon.
I noticed your personal repo was available for a moment, and took the opportunity to update the migration ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/RewriteTool-tp4824877p4825101.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
...update the migration
BTW why "firstVersion: spec <version: 'firstVersion'>". I've never seen this approach before. What is the reason to depart from numbered versions? ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/RewriteTool-tp4824877p4825102.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
To be honest I don't know:) I did the configuration at time I was really new to Pharo, and I just followed some tutorial, that people gave me at mailing list. So basically I did the config by instructions, without thinking why. What approach is considered to be common? Mark 2015-05-07 20:15 GMT+03:00 Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com>:
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
...update the migration
BTW why "firstVersion: spec <version: 'firstVersion'>". I've never seen this approach before. What is the reason to depart from numbered versions?
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/RewriteTool-tp4824877p4825102.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mark Rizun wrote
To be honest I don't know:)
Ah, okay. I thought maybe you had invented a cool new method ;) Mark Rizun wrote
What approach is considered to be common?
I just created one (ConfigurationOfRewriteTool-SeanDeNigris.7) via the Versionner GUI tool and uploaded to the PharoExtras repo. It also declares a stable version 1.0 so it can be loaded via the Configuration Browser. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/RewriteTool-tp4824877p4825105.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (4)
-
Jean-Christophe Bach -
Mark Rizun -
phil＠highoctane.be -
Sean P. DeNigris