[Pharo-project] Pharo 1.4 beta?
Hi guys I would like to see Pharo 1.4 going beta = focus on bugs, less changes. Does it make sense? What are the key problems we should focus on? Stef
Playing with Moose on Pharo 1.4 over the past couple of weeks, I did not notice any major problems. Cheers, Doru On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi guys
I would like to see Pharo 1.4 going beta = Â Â Â Â focus on bugs, less changes.
Does it make sense?
What are the key problems we should focus on?
Stef
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
On 02 Mar 2012, at 09:48, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi guys
I would like to see Pharo 1.4 going beta = focus on bugs, less changes.
Does it make sense?
What are the key problems we should focus on?
Stef
Yes, please, I has been pretty long already. I have been using 1.4 for some months now and I am beginning to switch certain production stuff. Like Marcus said: with the current CI things are (should be) ready all the time. Going beta, RC, release is just a label and some change in strategy (no risky stuff, more polishing). Let us all work a couple of weeks to stablelize everything. Problems will come up by themselves when we all start testing ;-) Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe http://stfx.eu Smalltalk is the Red Pill
Am 02.03.2012 um 09:48 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>:
Hi guys
I would like to see Pharo 1.4 going beta = focus on bugs, less changes.
Does it make sense?
Of course. And you know this. Release early, release often is also valid for pharo. And is not done, you just tell everyone else to do it like this ;) Norbert
What are the key problems we should focus on?
Stef
+1 El 02/03/2012, a las 6:17a.m., Norbert Hartl escribió:
Am 02.03.2012 um 09:48 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>:
Hi guys
I would like to see Pharo 1.4 going beta = focus on bugs, less changes.
Does it make sense?
Of course. And you know this. Release early, release often is also valid for pharo. And is not done, you just tell everyone else to do it like this ;)
Norbert
What are the key problems we should focus on?
Stef
On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 um 09:48 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>:
Hi guys
I would like to see Pharo 1.4 going beta = focus on bugs, less changes.
Does it make sense?
Of course. And you know this. Release early, release often is also valid for pharo. And is not done, you just tell everyone else to do it like this ;)
:) But I'm exclusively using 1.4a to code :). Seriously we want to make sure that in the future we can release anytime. Now it means that we need help to fix red tests and other bugs. Stef
+1 On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Sebastian Sastre < sebastian@flowingconcept.com> wrote:
+1
it would feel right (about timing)
sebastian <http://about.me/sebastianconcept>
o/
On Mar 2, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi guys
I would like to see Pharo 1.4 going beta = focus on bugs, less changes.
Does it make sense?
What are the key problems we should focus on?
Stef
+1. On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Sebastian Sastre < sebastian@flowingconcept.com> wrote:
+1
it would feel right (about timing)
sebastian <http://about.me/sebastianconcept>
o/
On Mar 2, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi guys
I would like to see Pharo 1.4 going beta = focus on bugs, less changes.
Does it make sense?
What are the key problems we should focus on?
Stef
participants (8)
-
Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras -
Esteban Lorenzano -
Guillermo Polito -
Norbert Hartl -
Sebastian Sastre -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Sven Van Caekenberghe -
Tudor Girba